Literature DB >> 24549772

Education attainment is associated with patient-reported outcomes: findings from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Meridith E Greene1, Ola Rolfson, Szilard Nemes, Max Gordon, Henrik Malchau, Göran Garellick.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Age, sex, and medical comorbidities may be associated with differences in patient-reported outcome scores after THA. Highest level of education may be a surrogate for socioeconomic status, but the degree to which this is associated with patient-reported outcomes after THA is not known. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We investigated the national Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register for the association of education attainment on patient-reported outcomes 1 year after THA; specifically, we evaluated level of education attainment against health-related quality of life (HRQoL), pain reduction, and satisfaction with treatment 1 year after THA.
METHODS: All THAs for osteoarthritis performed from 2005 through 2007 with complete patient-reported outcome measures (representing 49% of the THAs performed for this diagnosis) were selected from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. These cases were merged with national databases containing education attainment, marital status, and comorbidities (n = 11,464; mean age of patients, 64 years). The patient-reported outcome measure protocol included the HRQoL measure EuroQol five-dimension scale (EQ-5D), a VAS for pain, the Charnley classification survey, and a VAS addressing THA satisfaction. Linear regression analyses determined the association of preoperative patient factors with patient-reported outcomes.
RESULTS: High education attainment was associated with higher HRQoL (EQ-5D index ß(high) = 0.03 ± 0.01; EQ VAS ß(high) = 2.6 ± 0.5) after THA, whereas those with low and medium education were at risk for lower HRQoL. High education was associated with less pain after treatment (ß(high) = -3.3 ± 0.05). Individuals with low or medium education were at risk for less satisfaction with THA (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest clinicians should support patients with low and medium education to a greater extent. Identification of patients who will benefit most from THA and educating those at risk for poorer outcomes, like patients with low and medium education, ultimately may improve patient satisfaction, HRQoL, pain, and the cost utility of THA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24549772      PMCID: PMC4016468          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3504-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  21 in total

1.  The effect of education and income on need and willingness to undergo total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gillian A Hawker; James G Wright; Richard H Glazier; Peter C Coyte; Bart Harvey; J Ivan Williams; Elizabeth M Badley
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2002-12

Review 2.  A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods.

Authors:  Madeleine T King
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.217

3.  Patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register: results of a nationwide prospective observational study.

Authors:  O Rolfson; J Kärrholm; L E Dahlberg; G Garellick
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-07

4.  Social, educational, and occupational predictors of total hip replacement outcome.

Authors:  T Schäfer; F Krummenauer; J Mettelsiefen; S Kirschner; K P Günther
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Variation in rates of hip and knee joint replacement in Australia based on socio-economic status, geographical locality, birthplace and indigenous status.

Authors:  Tracy Dixon; Donna M Urquhart; Patricia Berry; Kuldeep Bhatia; Yuanyuan Wang; Stephen Graves; Flavia M Cicuttini
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 1.872

6.  Predicting dissatisfaction after total hip arthroplasty: a study of 850 patients.

Authors:  Raymond E Anakwe; Paul J Jenkins; Matthew Moran
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Associations of educational attainment, occupation, and community poverty with hip osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Rebecca J Cleveland; Todd A Schwartz; Lindsay P Prizer; Randy Randolph; Britta Schoster; Jordan B Renner; Joanne M Jordan; Leigh F Callahan
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.794

8.  Determinants of pain and functioning in hip osteoarthritis - a two-year prospective study.

Authors:  Riikka Juhakoski; Antti Malmivaara; Timo A Lakka; Seppo Tenhonen; Marja-Leena Hannila; Jari P A Arokoski
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.477

9.  Age, gender, obesity, and depression are associated with patient-related pain and function outcome after revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; David Lewallen
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  Socio-economic position has no effect on improvement in health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction in total hip and knee replacement: a cohort study.

Authors:  J Christiaan Keurentjes; David Blane; Melanie Bartley; Johan J B Keurentjes; Marta Fiocco; Rob G Nelissen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  25 in total

1.  Assessment of the Swedish EQ-5D experience-based value sets in a total hip replacement population.

Authors:  Szilárd Nemes; Kristina Burström; Niklas Zethraeus; Ted Eneqvist; Göran Garellick; Ola Rolfson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Editorial: large database studies--what they can do, what they cannot do, and which ones we will publish.

Authors:  Jonathan N Grauer; Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  [Personality and comorbidity: are there "difficult patients" in hip arthroplasty?].

Authors:  K-P Günther; E Haase; T Lange; C Kopkow; J Schmitt; C Jeszenszky; F Balck; J Lützner; A Hartmann; M Lippmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Knowledge and attitude towards total knee arthroplasty among the public in Saudi Arabia: a nationwide population-based study.

Authors:  Omar A Al-Mohrej; Faris O Alshammari; Abdulrahman M Aljuraisi; Lujain A Bin Amer; Emad M Masuadi; Nader S Al-Kenani
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Standard Comorbidity Measures Do Not Predict Patient-reported Outcomes 1 Year After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Meridith E Greene; Ola Rolfson; Max Gordon; Göran Garellick; Szilard Nemes
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Is social support associated with patient-reported outcomes after joint replacement? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  V Wylde; S K Kunutsor; E Lenguerrand; J Jackson; A W Blom; A D Beswick
Journal:  Lancet Rheumatol       Date:  2019-10-02

Review 7.  Racial/Ethnic, Socioeconomic, and Geographic Disparities in the Epidemiology of Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Leigh F Callahan; Rebecca J Cleveland; Kelli D Allen; Yvonne Golightly
Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 2.670

8.  CORR Insights(®): Standard Comorbidity Measures Do Not Predict Patient-reported Outcomes 1 Year After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  J Christiaan Keurentjes
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Preoperative predictors for outcomes after total hip replacement in patients with osteoarthritis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stefanie N Hofstede; Maaike G J Gademan; Thea P M Vliet Vlieland; Rob G H H Nelissen; Perla J Marang-van de Mheen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries Report of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries Part II. Recommendations for selection, administration, and analysis.

Authors:  Ola Rolfson; Eric Bohm; Patricia Franklin; Stephen Lyman; Geke Denissen; Jill Dawson; Jennifer Dunn; Kate Eresian Chenok; Michael Dunbar; Søren Overgaard; Göran Garellick; Anne Lübbeke
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.