Literature DB >> 24549214

Fertility clinicians and infertile patients in China have different preferences in fertility care.

Q F Cai1, F Wan, X Y Dong, X H Liao, J Zheng, R Wang, L Wang, L C Ji, H W Zhang.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Do the preferences for fertility care of infertile Chinese patients differ from those of fertility care providers? SUMMARY ANSWER: Infertile Chinese patients attached the greatest importance to physicians' attitude but, in contrast, fertility care providers in China considered treatment effectiveness to be the most important factor in fertility care. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: In Europe, physicians underestimate the importance of patient-centred infertility care. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A conjoint survey was distributed among 417 female infertile Chinese patients and 83 fertility care providers from February 2013 to August 2013. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: In this pilot study, 389 patients and 83 fertility care providers completed the survey at three reproductive medicine centres. Rating-based conjoint analysis was performed to elicit patients' and their caregivers' preferences regarding fertility care. Cluster analysis was used to explore the heterogeneity among patients' preferences. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: When searching for fertility care, patients valued the physicians' attitude the most, followed by success rates, distance from home to the fertility centre, physician continuity throughout the treatment period and type of fertility centre. Fertility care providers considered success rates (effectiveness) to be the most important factor when recommending a fertility centre. Fertility patients and care providers had significantly different views on the value of treatment effectiveness, physician attitude and physician continuity (P-values <0.05). Cluster analysis revealed that patients' preferences were heterogeneous. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The sample size is relatively small, and there is insufficient power for heterogeneity analysis. Two levels for each of five design factors (2(5)) may not fully capture the characteristics of realistic fertility centres. Rating-based conjoint analysis could be inferior to choice-based conjoint analysis in terms of predictive accuracy. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: Fertility care providers in China significantly underestimate the importance of patient-centredness to infertile patients. To deliver optimal fertility care to infertile Chinese patients, fertility care providers need to understand the importance of patient-centred care, such as a friendly attitude, sympathy for patients' suffering, respect for patients' right to informed consent and a transparent treatment process. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was not funded, and there are no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: None.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conjoint survey; fertility care; patient preferences; patient-centredness; treatment effectiveness

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24549214     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  8 in total

1.  MicroRNA-223-3p suppresses leukemia inhibitory factor expression and pinopodes formation during embryo implantation in mice.

Authors:  Xiyuan Dong; Cong Sui; Kai Huang; Lan Wang; Dan Hu; Ting Xiong; Rui Wang; Hanwang Zhang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  Using Latent Class Analysis to Model Preference Heterogeneity in Health: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mo Zhou; Winter Maxwell Thayer; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  What Matters to Women When Making Decisions About Breast Cancer Chemoprevention?

Authors:  Kathryn A Martinez; Angela Fagerlin; Holly O Witteman; Christine Holmberg; Sarah T Hawley
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Perceptions of Oncology Nurses Regarding Fertility Preservation and Providing Oncofertility Services for Men of Childbearing Age with Cancer.

Authors:  Han-Feng Zhang; Qing-Hua Jiang; Ying-Hong Fang; Li Jin; Gui-Yu Huang; Jing Wang; Hong-Fang Bai; Mika Miyashita
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  The Tell me tool: The development and feasibility of a tool for person-centred infertility care.

Authors:  Eva W Verkerk; Ester A Rake; Didi D M Braat; Willianne L D M Nelen; Johanna W M Aarts; Jan A M Kremer
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 3.318

6.  Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation for pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Han Yang; Wen-Hui Hu; Gui-Xing Xu; Zi-Han Yin; Si-Yi Yu; Jia-Jia Liu; Zhi-Yong Xiao; Xiao-Yan Zheng; Jie Yang; Fan-Rong Liang
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-08-11

7.  Out-of-pocket payment and patients' treatment choice for assisted reproductive technology by household income: a conjoint analysis using an online social research panel in Japan.

Authors:  Eri Maeda; Seung Chik Jwa; Yukiyo Kumazawa; Kazuki Saito; Arisa Iba; Ayako Yanagisawa-Sugita; Akira Kuwahara; Hidekazu Saito; Yukihiro Terada; Takashi Fukuda; Osamu Ishihara; Yasuki Kobayashi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 2.908

8.  How Do People with Experience of Infertility Value Different Aspects of Assistive Reproductive Therapy? Results from a Multi-Country Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Chris Skedgel; Eleanor Ralphs; Elaine Finn; Marie Markert; Carl Samuelsen; Jennifer A Whitty
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.481

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.