John Frater1, Fiona Ewings, Jacob Hurst, Helen Brown, Nicola Robinson, Sarah Fidler, Abdel Babiker, Jonathan Weber, Kholoud Porter, Rodney E Phillips. 1. aNuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital bPeter Medawar Building for Pathogen Research cInstitute for Emerging Infections, The Oxford Martin School dOxford National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford eMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit fMRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK gMwanza Intervention Trials Unit, Mwanza, Tanzania hDivision of Medicine, Wright Fleming Institute, Imperial College, London, UK. *Fiona Ewings and Jacob Hurst contributed equally to the writing of this article.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Immune factors determining clinical progression following HIV-1 infection remain unclear. The SPARTAC trial randomized 366 participants in primary HIV infection (PHI) to different short-course therapies. The aim of this study was to investigate how early immune responses in PHI impacted clinical progression in SPARTAC. DESIGN AND METHODS: Participants with PHI recruited to the SPARTAC trial were sampled at enrolment, prior to commencing any therapy. HIV-1-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) ELISpot responses were measured by gamma interferon ELISPOT. Immunological data were associated with baseline covariates and times to clinical progression using logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier plots, and Cox models. RESULTS: Making a CD4(+) T-cell ELISpot response (n = 119) at enrolment was associated with higher CD4(+) cell counts (P = 0.02) and to some extent lower plasma HIV RNA (P = 0.07). There was no correlation between the number of overlapping Gag CD8(+) T-cell ELISpot responses (n = 138) and plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load. Over a median follow-up of 2.9 years, baseline CD4(+) cell ELISpot responses (n = 119) were associated with slower clinical progression (P = 0.01; log-rank). Over a median of 3.1 years, there was no evidence for a survival advantage imposed by CD8(+) T-cell immunity (P = 0.82). CONCLUSION: These data support a dominant protective role for CD4(+) T-cell immunity in PHI compared with CD8(+) T-cell responses, and are highly pertinent to HIV pathogenesis and vaccines, indicating that vaccine-induced CD4(+) responses may confer sustained benefit.
OBJECTIVES: Immune factors determining clinical progression following HIV-1 infection remain unclear. The SPARTAC trial randomized 366 participants in primary HIV infection (PHI) to different short-course therapies. The aim of this study was to investigate how early immune responses in PHI impacted clinical progression in SPARTAC. DESIGN AND METHODS: Participants with PHI recruited to the SPARTAC trial were sampled at enrolment, prior to commencing any therapy. HIV-1-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) ELISpot responses were measured by gamma interferon ELISPOT. Immunological data were associated with baseline covariates and times to clinical progression using logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier plots, and Cox models. RESULTS: Making a CD4(+) T-cell ELISpot response (n = 119) at enrolment was associated with higher CD4(+) cell counts (P = 0.02) and to some extent lower plasma HIV RNA (P = 0.07). There was no correlation between the number of overlapping Gag CD8(+) T-cell ELISpot responses (n = 138) and plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load. Over a median follow-up of 2.9 years, baseline CD4(+) cell ELISpot responses (n = 119) were associated with slower clinical progression (P = 0.01; log-rank). Over a median of 3.1 years, there was no evidence for a survival advantage imposed by CD8(+) T-cell immunity (P = 0.82). CONCLUSION: These data support a dominant protective role for CD4(+) T-cell immunity in PHI compared with CD8(+) T-cell responses, and are highly pertinent to HIV pathogenesis and vaccines, indicating that vaccine-induced CD4(+) responses may confer sustained benefit.
Authors: A Saez-Cirion; B Jacquelin; F Barré-Sinoussi; M Müller-Trutwin Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2014-05-12 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Miriam Schieffer; Heiko K Jessen; Alexander F Oster; Franco Pissani; Damien Z Soghoian; Richard Lu; Arne B Jessen; Carmen Zedlack; Bruce T Schultz; Isaiah Davis; Srinika Ranasinghe; Eric S Rosenberg; Galit Alter; Ralf R Schumann; Hendrik Streeck Journal: J Virol Date: 2014-04-16 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Hannah E Roberts; Jacob Hurst; Nicola Robinson; Helen Brown; Peter Flanagan; Laura Vass; Sarah Fidler; Jonathan Weber; Abdel Babiker; Rodney E Phillips; Angela R McLean; John Frater Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2015-02-02 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: Wei Zhen Chow; Sin How Lim; Lai Yee Ong; Yean Kong Yong; Yutaka Takebe; Adeeba Kamarulzaman; Kok Keng Tee Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-09-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jacob Hurst; Matthias Hoffmann; Matthew Pace; James P Williams; John Thornhill; Elizabeth Hamlyn; Jodi Meyerowitz; Chris Willberg; Kersten K Koelsch; Nicola Robinson; Helen Brown; Martin Fisher; Sabine Kinloch; David A Cooper; Mauro Schechter; Giuseppe Tambussi; Sarah Fidler; Abdel Babiker; Jonathan Weber; Anthony D Kelleher; Rodney E Phillips; John Frater Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2015-10-09 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: James P Williams; Jacob Hurst; Wolfgang Stöhr; Nicola Robinson; Helen Brown; Martin Fisher; Sabine Kinloch; David Cooper; Mauro Schechter; Giuseppe Tambussi; Sarah Fidler; Mary Carrington; Abdel Babiker; Jonathan Weber; Kersten K Koelsch; Anthony D Kelleher; Rodney E Phillips; John Frater Journal: Elife Date: 2014-09-12 Impact factor: 8.140