Literature DB >> 24549049

Influence of external bacterial structures on the efficiency of photodynamic inactivation by a cationic porphyrin.

M A Pereira1, M A F Faustino, J P C Tomé, M G P M S Neves, A C Tomé, J A S Cavaleiro, Â Cunha, A Almeida.   

Abstract

The main targets of photodynamic inactivation (PDI) are the external bacterial structures, cytoplasmic membrane and cell wall. In this work it was evaluated how the external bacterial structures influence the PDI efficiency. To reach this objective 8 bacteria with distinct external structures were selected; 4 Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli, with typical Gram-negative external structures; Aeromonas salmonicida, Aeromonas hydrophila both with an S-layer and Rhodopirellula sp., with a peptidoglycan-less proteinaceous cell wall and with cytoplasm compartmentalization) and 4 Gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus, with typical Gram-positive external structures; Truepera radiovictrix, Deinococcus geothermalis and Deinococcus radiodurans, all with thick cell walls that give them Gram-positive stains, but including a second complex multi-layered membrane and structurally analogous to that of Gram-negative bacteria). The studies were performed in the presence of 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(1-methylpyridinium-4-yl)porphyrin tetraiodide (Tetra-Py(+)-Me) at 5.0 μM with white light (40 W m(-2)). The susceptibility of each bacteria to PDI by Tetra-Py(+)-Me was dependent on bacteria external structures. Although all Gram-positive bacteria were inactivated to the detection limit (reduction of ∼8 log) after 60-180 min of irradiation, the inactivation followed distinct patterns. Among the Gram-negative bacteria, E. coli was the only species to be inactivated to the detection limit (∼8 log after 180 min). The efficiency of inactivation of the two species of Aeromonas was similar (reduction of ∼5-6 log after 270 min). Rhodopirellula was less susceptible (reduction of ∼4 log after 270 min). As previously observed, the Gram-positive bacteria are more easily inactivated than Gram-negative strains, and this is even true for T. radiovictrix, D. geothermalis and D. radiodurans, which have a complex multi-layered cell wall. The results support the theory that the outer cell structures are major bacterial targets for PDI. Moreover, the chemical composition of the external structures has a stronger effect on PDI efficiency than complexity and the number of layers of the external coating, and lipids seem to be an important target of PDI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24549049     DOI: 10.1039/c3pp50408e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci        ISSN: 1474-905X            Impact factor:   3.982


  22 in total

1.  Potentiation by potassium iodide reveals that the anionic porphyrin TPPS4 is a surprisingly effective photosensitizer for antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation.

Authors:  Liyi Huang; Ahmed El-Hussein; Weijun Xuan; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 6.252

2.  Photodynamic Inactivation Mediated by Erythrosine and its Derivatives on Foodborne Pathogens and Spoilage Bacteria.

Authors:  Natália Norika Yassunaka; Camila Fabiano de Freitas; Bruno Ribeiro Rabello; Patrícia Regina Santos; Wilker Caetano; Noboru Hioka; Tania Ueda Nakamura; Benício Alves de Abreu Filho; Jane Martha Graton Mikcha
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Photodynamic inactivation of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and biofilms by hematoporphyrin monomethyl ether.

Authors:  Chengcheng Liu; Min Hu; Dandan Ma; Jin'e Lei; Jiru Xu
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Potassium Iodide Potentiates Broad-Spectrum Antimicrobial Photodynamic Inactivation Using Photofrin.

Authors:  Liyi Huang; Grzegorz Szewczyk; Tadeusz Sarna; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  ACS Infect Dis       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 5.084

5.  Photodynamic Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 Infectivity and Antiviral Treatment Effects In Vitro.

Authors:  Svitlana Ziganshyna; Grit Szczepankiewicz; Mathias Kuehnert; Agnes Schulze; Uwe Gerd Liebert; Corinna Pietsch; Volker Eulenburg; Robert Werdehausen
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 5.818

6.  A series of water-soluble photosensitizers based on 3-cinnamoylcoumarin for in vitro antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation.

Authors:  Zhiyuan Sun; Shaona Zhou; Haixia Qiu; Ying Gu; Yuxia Zhao
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 4.036

7.  Factors Determining Staphylococcus aureus Susceptibility to Photoantimicrobial Chemotherapy: RsbU Activity, Staphyloxanthin Level, and Membrane Fluidity.

Authors:  Monika Kossakowska-Zwierucho; Rajmund Kaźmierkiewicz; Krzysztof P Bielawski; Joanna Nakonieczna
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Photoinactivation of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae in kiwifruit plants by cationic porphyrins.

Authors:  Diana Martins; Mariana Q Mesquita; Maria G P M S Neves; Maria A F Faustino; Luís Reis; Etelvina Figueira; Adelaide Almeida
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 4.116

Review 9.  Antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation in nanomedicine: small light strides against bad bugs.

Authors:  Rui Yin; Tanupriya Agrawal; Usman Khan; Gaurav K Gupta; Vikrant Rai; Ying-Ying Huang; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.307

10.  Carboranyl-Chlorin e6 as a Potent Antimicrobial Photosensitizer.

Authors:  Elena O Omarova; Pavel A Nazarov; Alexander M Firsov; Marina G Strakhovskaya; Anastasia Yu Arkhipova; Mikhail M Moisenovich; Igor I Agapov; Valentina A Ol'shevskaya; Andrey V Zaitsev; Valery N Kalinin; Elena A Kotova; Yuri N Antonenko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.