Literature DB >> 24548286

Successes and challenges from formation to implementation of eleven broad-extent conservation programs.

Erik A Beever1, Brady J Mattsson, Matthew J Germino, Max Post Van Der Burg, John B Bradford, Mark W Brunson.   

Abstract

Integration of conservation partnerships across geographic, biological, and administrative boundaries is increasingly relevant because drivers of change, such as climate shifts, transcend these boundaries. We explored successes and challenges of established conservation programs that span multiple watersheds and consider both social and ecological concerns. We asked representatives from a diverse set of 11 broad-extent conservation partnerships in 29 countries 17 questions that pertained to launching and maintaining partnerships for broad-extent conservation, specifying ultimate management objectives, and implementation and learning. Partnerships invested more funds in implementing conservation actions than any other aspect of conservation, and a program's context (geographic extent, United States vs. other countries, developed vs. developing nation) appeared to substantially affect program approach. Despite early successes of these organizations and benefits of broad-extent conservation, specific challenges related to uncertainties in scaling up information and to coordination in the face of diverse partner governance structures, conflicting objectives, and vast uncertainties regarding future system dynamics hindered long-term success, as demonstrated by the focal organizations. Engaging stakeholders, developing conservation measures, and implementing adaptive management were dominant challenges. To inform future research on broad-extent conservation, we considered several challenges when we developed detailed questions, such as what qualities of broad-extent partnerships ensure they complement, integrate, and strengthen, rather than replace, local conservation efforts and which adaptive management processes yield actionable conservation strategies that account explicitly for dynamics and uncertainties regarding multiscale governance, environmental conditions, and knowledge of the system?
© 2014 Society for Conservation Biology.

Keywords:  adaptive management; aprendizaje; ecological; escalas jerárquicas; hierarchical scales; incertidumbre ecológica; learning management objectives and actions; manejo adaptativo; objetivos y acciones de manejo; social and political uncertainty; social y política

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24548286     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  3 in total

1.  Implementation strategies for systematic conservation planning.

Authors:  Vanessa M Adams; Morena Mills; Rebecca Weeks; Daniel B Segan; Robert L Pressey; Georgina G Gurney; Craig Groves; Frank W Davis; Jorge G Álvarez-Romero
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-06-09       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  Factoring economic costs into conservation planning may not improve agreement over priorities for protection.

Authors:  Paul R Armsworth; Heather B Jackson; Seong-Hoon Cho; Melissa Clark; Joseph E Fargione; Gwenllian D Iacona; Taeyoung Kim; Eric R Larson; Thomas Minney; Nathan A Sutton
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 17.694

3.  Climate change adaptation benefits of potential conservation partnerships.

Authors:  William B Monahan; David M Theobald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.