Literature DB >> 24548282

Randomized controlled trials in the journal of sexual medicine: a quality assessment and relevant clinical impact.

Jung Ki Jo1, Jae Hoon Chung1, Kyu Shik Kim1, Jeong Woo Lee2, Seung Wook Lee3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Quality assessment of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) is important to prevent the adoption of findings of low-quality trials into clinical practice. AIM: The aim if this study was to analyze the quality of studies reporting RCTs in the Journal of Sexual Medicine (JSM) and to find relevant clinical impact.
METHODS: A quality assessment was conducted in all studies identified as RCTs published in the JSM from 2004 to 2012. The review period was divided into three periods: early (2004-2006), mid (2007-2009), and late (2010-2012). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Jadad scale, van Tulder scale, and the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool (CCRBT) quality scoring instruments were used. The RCTs were also categorized by country of origin, topic, the inclusion of institutional review board (IRB) approval, funding, citation rate, and impact factor.
RESULTS: A total of 2,418 original articles were published in the JSM during the review period, and 188 were reports of RCTs. There were 39 (14.89%), 70 (7.77%), and 76 (6.29%) RCTs published during the early, mid, and late terms, respectively (P < 0.001). No significant increases in Jadad or van Tulder scale scores were found over time nor were there any significant changes in the number of low-risk articles as assessed by the CCRBT. However, significant differences in quality analysis were found in funding and IRB approval. Citation rates and impact factor were not correlated with RCT quality using any of the tools.
CONCLUSIONS: The number of original articles and RCTs published in the JSM increased over time. However, the ratio of RCTs to original articles did not increase significantly. Adequate randomization and blinding methods, IRB review, and financial support are required for the conduct of high-quality RCTs.
© 2014 International Society for Sexual Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CONSORT Statement; Randomized Control Trial; Reporting Quality

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24548282     DOI: 10.1111/jsm.12455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  4 in total

1.  Quality analysis of randomized controlled trials in the International Journal of Impotence Research: quality assessment and relevant clinical impact.

Authors:  K S Kim; J K Jo; J H Chung; J H Kim; H Y Choi; S W Lee
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.896

2.  Quality of randomized controlled trials published in the International Urogynecology Journal 2007-2016.

Authors:  Kyu Shik Kim; Jae Hoon Chung; Jung Ki Jo; Jae Heon Kim; Seungjun Kim; Jeoung Man Cho; Hee Ju Cho; Hong Yong Choi; Seung Wook Lee
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Altmetrics Attention Scores for Randomized Controlled Trials in Total Joint Arthroplasty Are Reflective of High Scientific Quality: An Altmetrics-Based Methodological Quality and Bias Analysis.

Authors:  Kyle N Kunze; Michelle Richardson; David N Bernstein; Ajay Premkumar; Nicolas S Piuzzi; Alexander S McLawhorn
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2020-12

4.  Quality Assessment and Relevant Clinical Impact of Randomized Controlled Trials of Varicocele: Next Step to Good-Quality Randomized Controlled Trial of Varicocele Treatment.

Authors:  Kyu Shik Kim; Jae Hoon Chung; Hyung Joon Park; Woo Jong Shin; Bum Hyun Lee; Seung Wook Lee
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 5.400

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.