Literature DB >> 24548084

Spinal motion restriction: an educational and implementation program to redefine prehospital spinal assessment and care.

James F Morrissey, Elsie R Kusel, Karl A Sporer.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Prehospital spine immobilization has long been applied to victims of trauma in the United States and up to 5 million patients per year are immobilized mostly with a cervical collar and a backboard.
OBJECTIVE: The training of paramedics and emergency medical technicians on the principals of spine motion restriction (SMR) will decrease the use of backboards.
METHODS: The training for SMR emphasized the need to immobilize those patients with a significant potential for an unstable cervical spine fracture and to use alternative methods of maintaining spine precautions for those with lower risk. The training addressed the potential complications of the use of the unpadded backboard and education was provided about the mechanics of spine injuries. Emergency medical services (EMS} personnel were taught to differentiate between the critical multisystem trauma patients from the more common moderate, low kinetic energy trauma patients. A comprehensive education and outreach program that included all of the EMS providers (fire and private), hospitals, and EMS educational institutions was developed.
RESULTS: Within 4 months of the policy implementation, prehospital care practitioners reduced the use of the backboard by 58%. This was accomplished by a decrease in the number of patients considered for SMR with low kinetic energy and the use of other methods, such as the cervical collar only.
CONCLUSION: The implementation of a SMR training program significantly decreases the use of backboards and allows alternative methods of maintaining spine precautions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24548084     DOI: 10.3109/10903127.2013.869643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care        ISSN: 1090-3127            Impact factor:   3.077


  6 in total

1.  Removal of the Long Spine Board From Clinical Practice: A Historical Perspective.

Authors:  Francis X Feld
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  Cervical immobilization in trauma patients: soft collars better than rigid collars? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Henrik C Bäcker; Patrick Elias; Karl F Braun; Michael A Johnson; Peter Turner; John Cunningham
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 2.721

3.  Effect of spinal immobilisation devices on radiation exposure in conventional radiography and computed tomography.

Authors:  Baukje Hemmes; Cécile R L P N Jeukens; Gerrit J Kemerink; Peter R G Brink; Martijn Poeze
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-01-11

4.  Effect of training in advanced trauma life support on the kinematics of the spine: A simulation study.

Authors:  Raquel Gordillo Martin; Pedro E Alcaráz; Laura Juguera Rodriguez; Antonio Nieto Fernandez-Pacheco; Elena Marín-Cascales; Tomás T Freitas; Manuel Pardo Rios
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Paramedic attitudes towards prehospital spinal care: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Neil McDonald; Dean Kriellaars; Rob T Pryce
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2022-09-20

6.  Confirmation of suboptimal protocols in spinal immobilisation?

Authors:  Mark Dixon; Joseph O'Halloran; Ailish Hannigan; Scott Keenan; Niamh M Cummins
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 2.740

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.