Literature DB >> 2454247

Comparison of the efferents of the amygdala and the hippocampal formation in the rhesus monkey: II. Reciprocal and non-reciprocal connections.

R C Saunders1, D L Rosene, G W Van Hoesen.   

Abstract

The pattern of direct connections between the amygdala and the hippocampal formation in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) was delineated by using both anterograde and retrograde tract-tracing techniques. From the amygdala the accessory basal, medial basal, and the cortical nuclei and the cortical amygdaloid transition area send projections to the hippocampal formation. The efferents from the magnocellular part of the accessory basal nucleus and the cortical nuclei terminate in the molecular layer of subfields CA3, CA2, and CA1', and to a lesser extent in the molecular layer and the superficial part of the pyramidal cell layers of the prosubiculum. In contrast, the projections from the medial basal nucleus and the cortical amygdaloid transition area terminate in the molecular layer and the superficial part of the pyramidal cell layers of the prosubiculum only. From the hippocampal formation, subfield CA1' and the prosubiculum send efferents that terminate in the medial basal nucleus, the cortical transition area, and the ventral part of the cortical nuclei. In addition, the CA1' subfield projects to the ventral, parvicellular part of the accessory basal nucleus. The present data emphasize an important role for the prosubiculum and the CA1' subfield in medial temporal lobe area connections. Both regions, in addition to supporting direct connections between the amygdala and the hippocampal formation, also have extensive connections with the entorhinal cortex. As for the amygdala, the accessory basal nucleus sends efferents to both the hippocampal formation and the entorhinal cortex. The data demonstrate an anatomical means by which the amygdala, hippocampal formation, and the entorhinal cortex may interact. It is proposed that these connections may be important in the limbic memory system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2454247     DOI: 10.1002/cne.902710203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Neurol        ISSN: 0021-9967            Impact factor:   3.215


  47 in total

1.  The subjective experience of pain: where expectations become reality.

Authors:  Tetsuo Koyama; John G McHaffie; Paul J Laurienti; Robert C Coghill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Greater working memory load results in greater medial temporal activity at retrieval.

Authors:  Karin Schon; Yakeel T Quiroz; Michael E Hasselmo; Chantal E Stern
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Distribution of serotonin transporter labeled fibers in amygdaloid subregions: implications for mood disorders.

Authors:  Howard O'Rourke; Julie L Fudge
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 13.382

4.  Working memory for social cues recruits orbitofrontal cortex and amygdala: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of delayed matching to sample for emotional expressions.

Authors:  Matthew L LoPresti; Karin Schon; Marisa D Tricarico; Jascha D Swisher; Kim A Celone; Chantal E Stern
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Resting state connectivity of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis at ultra-high field.

Authors:  Salvatore Torrisi; Katherine O'Connell; Andrew Davis; Richard Reynolds; Nicholas Balderston; Julie L Fudge; Christian Grillon; Monique Ernst
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Organization of corticostriatal and corticoamygdalar projections arising from the anterior inferotemporal area TE of the macaque monkey: a Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin study.

Authors:  K Cheng; K S Saleem; K Tanaka
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Emotional brain states carry over and enhance future memory formation.

Authors:  Arielle Tambini; Ulrike Rimmele; Elizabeth A Phelps; Lila Davachi
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Selective lesion of the hippocampus increases the differentiation of immature neurons in the monkey amygdala.

Authors:  Loïc J Chareyron; David G Amaral; Pierre Lavenex
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Specificity of Primate Amygdalar Pathways to Hippocampus.

Authors:  Jingyi Wang; Helen Barbas
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Amygdala projections to central amygdaloid nucleus subdivisions and transition zones in the primate.

Authors:  J L Fudge; T Tucker
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 3.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.