BACKGROUND: HIV-infected patients administered long-term ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors (PIs) are at a greater risk for developing cardiovascular diseases. Endothelial dysfunction is an initiating event in HIV-associated atherosclerosis. Cultured endothelial cells can be used as a model to compare the endothelial toxicity of different PIs. METHODS: We compared the effect of darunavir (DRV), darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r), lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) and atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r), used at clinically relevant concentrations, on human coronary artery endothelial cell vascular function, oxidative stress, inflammation and senescence, and studied the effect of pravastatin on PI-induced alterations. RESULTS: Vascular endothelial cell function, evaluated by the expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase and the production of nitric oxide and endothelin-1, was unaffected by DRV or DRV/r, but altered by LPV/r or ATV/r. DRV or DRV/r did not alter, or mildly induced oxidative stress and inflammation (phosphorylation of p65/RelA-NFκB, secretion of IL-6 and IL-8), while ATV/r and LPV/r induced a marked increase. Secretion of sICAM or sVCAM, indicative of altered cell integrity, was not or weakly altered by DRV or DRV/r, but increased by 2-3-fold by LPV/r or ATV/r. Similar results were observed regarding senescence markers: SA-β-galactosidase activation and overexpression of phospho-p53, p16(ink4), p21(WAF-1) and prelamin A. Pravastatin could, in part, reverse PI-induced adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Ritonavir-boosted PIs differentially induced vascular endothelial cell dysfunction, reactive oxygen species production, inflammation and senescence with no effect or a mild effect of DRV/r, an intermediate effect of ATV/r, and a stronger effect of LPV/r. Statins could, in part, protect the cells from PI-induced endothelial dysfunction.
BACKGROUND:HIV-infectedpatients administered long-term ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors (PIs) are at a greater risk for developing cardiovascular diseases. Endothelial dysfunction is an initiating event in HIV-associated atherosclerosis. Cultured endothelial cells can be used as a model to compare the endothelial toxicity of different PIs. METHODS: We compared the effect of darunavir (DRV), darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r), lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) and atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r), used at clinically relevant concentrations, on human coronary artery endothelial cell vascular function, oxidative stress, inflammation and senescence, and studied the effect of pravastatin on PI-induced alterations. RESULTS: Vascular endothelial cell function, evaluated by the expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase and the production of nitric oxide and endothelin-1, was unaffected by DRV or DRV/r, but altered by LPV/r or ATV/r. DRV or DRV/r did not alter, or mildly induced oxidative stress and inflammation (phosphorylation of p65/RelA-NFκB, secretion of IL-6 and IL-8), while ATV/r and LPV/r induced a marked increase. Secretion of sICAM or sVCAM, indicative of altered cell integrity, was not or weakly altered by DRV or DRV/r, but increased by 2-3-fold by LPV/r or ATV/r. Similar results were observed regarding senescence markers: SA-β-galactosidase activation and overexpression of phospho-p53, p16(ink4), p21(WAF-1) and prelamin A. Pravastatin could, in part, reverse PI-induced adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS:Ritonavir-boosted PIs differentially induced vascular endothelial cell dysfunction, reactive oxygen species production, inflammation and senescence with no effect or a mild effect of DRV/r, an intermediate effect of ATV/r, and a stronger effect of LPV/r. Statins could, in part, protect the cells from PI-induced endothelial dysfunction.
Authors: Bernard J Macatangay; Ming Yang; Xin Sun; Jessica Morton; Victor De Gruttola; Susan Little; Christine Hogan; Charles R Rinaldo Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Virawudh Soontornniyomkij; Anya Umlauf; Benchawanna Soontornniyomkij; Ben Gouaux; Ronald J Ellis; Andrew J Levine; David J Moore; Scott L Letendre Journal: AIDS Date: 2018-09-10 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Ankit Shah; Mohitkumar R Gangwani; Nitish S Chaudhari; Alexy Glazyrin; Hari K Bhat; Anil Kumar Journal: Neurotox Res Date: 2016-06-30 Impact factor: 3.911
Authors: Ricardo Moure; Pere Domingo; Joan Villarroya; Laura Gasa; José M Gallego-Escuredo; Tania Quesada-López; Samantha Morón-Ros; Alberto F Maroto; Gracia M Mateo; Joan C Domingo; Francesc Villarroya; Marta Giralt Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2018-05-25 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: John E Lewis; Steven E Atlas; Muhammad H Abbas; Ammar Rasul; Ashar Farooqi; Laura A Lantigua; Frederick Michaud; Sharon Goldberg; Lucas C Lages; Jinrun Gao; Oscar L Higuera; Andrea Fiallo; Philip D Harvey; Eduard Tiozzo; Judi M Woolger; Stephanie Ciraula; Armando Mendez; Allan Rodriguez; Janet Konefal Journal: J Clin Transl Res Date: 2020-04-13