OBJECTIVES: This review examined rates and definitions of disengagement among services for first-episode psychosis (FEP) and identified the most relevant demographic and clinical predictors of disengagement. METHODS: A comprehensive search for and review of published studies that reported rates and predictors of disengagement within FEP services were conducted. The databases PubMed (1966-2012) and PsycINFO (1882-2012) were searched. Relevant terms were used to search the Internet and the reference sections of relevant papers for other pertinent studies. Independent searches for recent publications by leading researchers in the field were also conducted. RESULTS: Ten articles were included in the review. There was a lack of consensus on a clear definition of engagement and disengagement. However, despite differences in definitions and study settings, the evidence reviewed indicates that approximately 30% of individuals with FEP disengage from services. Variables that were consistently found to exert an influence on disengagement across studies were duration of untreated psychosis, symptom severity at baseline, insight, substance abuse and dependence, and involvement of a family member. CONCLUSIONS: Given the importance of continuity of care for FEP, there is a need for a clearly defined and agreed measurement of service engagement and disengagement across FEP services. In particular, those who enter an FEP program without family involvement and support as well as those who maintain persistent substance abuse are at higher risk of disengagement. Early identification of such individuals and the development of approaches to reduce risk of service disengagement are likely to increase the effectiveness of these services.
OBJECTIVES: This review examined rates and definitions of disengagement among services for first-episode psychosis (FEP) and identified the most relevant demographic and clinical predictors of disengagement. METHODS: A comprehensive search for and review of published studies that reported rates and predictors of disengagement within FEP services were conducted. The databases PubMed (1966-2012) and PsycINFO (1882-2012) were searched. Relevant terms were used to search the Internet and the reference sections of relevant papers for other pertinent studies. Independent searches for recent publications by leading researchers in the field were also conducted. RESULTS: Ten articles were included in the review. There was a lack of consensus on a clear definition of engagement and disengagement. However, despite differences in definitions and study settings, the evidence reviewed indicates that approximately 30% of individuals with FEP disengage from services. Variables that were consistently found to exert an influence on disengagement across studies were duration of untreated psychosis, symptom severity at baseline, insight, substance abuse and dependence, and involvement of a family member. CONCLUSIONS: Given the importance of continuity of care for FEP, there is a need for a clearly defined and agreed measurement of service engagement and disengagement across FEP services. In particular, those who enter an FEP program without family involvement and support as well as those who maintain persistent substance abuse are at higher risk of disengagement. Early identification of such individuals and the development of approaches to reduce risk of service disengagement are likely to increase the effectiveness of these services.
Authors: Alicia Lucksted; Susan M Essock; Jennifer Stevenson; Sapna J Mendon; Ilana R Nossel; Howard H Goldman; Amy B Goldstein; Lisa B Dixon Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Leslie Marino; Ilana Nossel; Jean C Choi; Keith Nuechterlein; Yuanjia Wang; Susan Essock; Melanie Bennett; Karen McNamara; Sapna Mendon; Lisa Dixon Journal: J Nerv Ment Dis Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 2.254
Authors: Anna-Leigh Powell; Cassandra Hinger; Erica D Marshall-Lee; Tonya Miller-Roberts; Kayla Phillips Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2020-05-29
Authors: Vinod H Srihari; Cenk Tek; Suat Kucukgoncu; Vivek H Phutane; Nicholas J K Breitborde; Jessica Pollard; Banu Ozkan; John Saksa; Barbara C Walsh; Scott W Woods Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2015-02-02 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Marc De Hert; Jan Sermon; Paul Geerts; Kristof Vansteelandt; Joseph Peuskens; Johan Detraux Journal: CNS Drugs Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 5.749
Authors: Franco Mascayano; Els van der Ven; Gonzalo Martinez-Ales; Cale Basaraba; Nev Jones; Rufina Lee; Iruma Bello; Ilana Nossel; Stephen Smith; Thomas E Smith; Melanie Wall; Ezra Susser; Lisa B Dixon Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 3.084