Literature DB >> 24535090

Pretreatment of Cr(VI)-amended soil with chromate-reducing rhizobacteria decreases plant toxicity and increases the yield of Pisum sativum.

Sumit K Soni1, Rakshapal Singh, Mangal Singh, Ashutosh Awasthi, Kundan Wasnik, Alok Kalra.   

Abstract

Pot culture experiments were performed under controlled greenhouse conditions to investigate whether four Cr(VI)-reducing bacterial strains (SUCR44, SUCR140, SUCR186, and SUCR188) were able to decrease Cr toxicity to Pisum sativum plants in artificially Cr(VI)-contaminated soil. The effect of pretreatment of soil with chromate-reducing bacteria on plant growth, chromate uptake, bioaccumulation, nodulation, and population of Rhizobium was found to be directly influenced by the time interval between bacterial treatment and seed sowing. Pretreatment of soil with SUCR140 (Microbacterium sp.) 15 days before sowing (T+15) showed a maximum increase in growth and biomass in terms of root length (93 %), plant height (94 %), dry root biomass (99 %), and dry shoot biomass (99 %). Coinoculation of Rhizobium with SUCR140 further improved the aforementioned parameter. Compared with the control, coinoculation of SUCR140+R showed a 117, 116, 136, and 128 % increase, respectively, in root length, plant height, dry root biomass, and dry shoot biomass. The bioavailability of Cr(VI) decreased significantly in soil (61 %) and in uptake (36 %) in SUCR140-treated plants; the effects of Rhizobium, however, either alone or in the presence of SUCR140, were not significant. The populations of Rhizobium (126 %) in soil and nodulation (146 %) in P. sativum improved in the presence of SUCR140 resulting in greater nitrogen (54 %) concentration in the plants. This study shows the usefulness of efficient Cr(VI)-reducing bacterial strain SUCR140 in improving yields probably through decreased Cr toxicity and improved symbiotic relationship of the plants with Rhizobium. Further decrease in the translocation of Cr(VI) through improved nodulation by Rhizobium in the presence of efficient Cr-reducing bacterial strains could also decrease the accumulation of Cr in shoots.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24535090     DOI: 10.1007/s00244-014-0003-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol        ISSN: 0090-4341            Impact factor:   2.804


  5 in total

1.  Cr(VI) removal from aqueous solution by thermophilic denitrifying bacterium Chelatococcus daeguensis TAD1 in the presence of single and multiple heavy metals.

Authors:  Han Li; Shaobin Huang; Yongqing Zhang
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.422

2.  Efficient removal of chromate ions from aqueous solution using a highly cost-effective ferric coordinated [3-(2-aminoethylamino)propyl]trimethoxysilane-MCM-41 adsorbent.

Authors:  Rakesh Kumar Madri; Dhanesh Tiwari; Indrajit Sinha
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.361

3.  Management of chromium(VI)-contaminated soils through synergistic application of vermicompost, chromate reducing rhizobacteria and Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) reduced plant toxicity and improved yield attributes in Ocimum basilicum L.

Authors:  Sumit K Soni; Rakshapal Singh; Sudeep Tiwari
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 2.667

4.  Azotobacter vinelandii helps to combat chromium stress in rice by maintaining antioxidant machinery.

Authors:  Ranjan Kumar Sahoo; Varsha Rani; Narendra Tuteja
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 2.893

5.  Alleviating Cr(VI) stress in horse gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum Var. Madhu) by native Cr-tolerant nodule endophytes isolated from contaminated site of Sukinda.

Authors:  Shilpee Dhali; Madhusmita Pradhan; Ranjan Kumar Sahoo; Santanu Mohanty; Chinmay Pradhan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 5.190

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.