Literature DB >> 24535023

How has the Affordable Care Act's medical loss ratio regulation affected insurer behavior?

Jean M Abraham1, Pinar Karaca-Mandic, Kosali Simon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Starting in 2011, the Affordable Care Act stipulates that insurers meet the minimum medical loss ratio (MLR) standards or issue rebates. An MLR is the proportion of premium revenues spent on clinical benefits, and must be at least 80% in the individual and small-group markets. Although some insurers have issued rebates, it is unclear whether they also adjusted MLRs and their components in ways to move toward compliance.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate early responses of individual and small-group insurers' MLR-related outcomes to the Affordable Care Act provisions. RESEARCH
DESIGN: Descriptive and multivariate analyses using 2010-2011 data from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners and other sources. MEASURES: Outcomes include MLRs, MLR components (claims incurred, premiums earned, quality improvement expenses, and fraud detection/recovery expenses), and administrative expenses.
RESULTS: In 2010, only 44.3% of individual market insurers reported MLRs of at least the stipulated level; by 2011, this percentage was 63.2%. Among small-group insurers, 74.9% had 2010 MLRs at or above the stipulated level, with little change in 2011. Individual insurers with 2010 MLRs >10 percentage points below the minimum exhibited the largest increases in MLRs, with changes occurring through increases in claims and indirectly through decreases in administrative expenses.
CONCLUSIONS: Early responses to MLR regulation seem more pronounced in the individual versus small-group market, with insurers using both direct and indirect strategies for compliance. Because insurers learned of final MLR regulations only in late 2010, early responses may be limited and skewed more toward greater use of rebates than other adjustments.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24535023     DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  4 in total

1.  Community Health Center Utilization Following the 2008 Medicaid Expansion in Oregon: Implications for the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  Brigit Hatch; Steffani R Bailey; Stuart Cowburn; Miguel Marino; Heather Angier; Jennifer E DeVoe
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Getting to 100%: Research Priorities and Unanswered Questions to Inform the US Debate on Universal Health Insurance Coverage.

Authors:  Peter Cram; Harry Selker; Jennifer Carnahan; Santiago Romero-Brufau; Michael A Fischer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Medical loss ratio as a potential regulatory tool in the Israeli healthcare system.

Authors:  Tzahit Simon-Tuval; Tuvia Horev; Giora Kaplan
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2015-05-01

4.  Same Game, Different Names: Cream-Skimming in the Post-ACA Individual Health Insurance Market.

Authors:  Daniel W Sacks; Coleman Drake; Jean M Abraham; Kosali Simon
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.