Literature DB >> 24534359

Utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in follow-up of patients with low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary.

Satoshi Takeuchi1, Martin Lucchini2, Kathleen M Schmeler3, Robert L Coleman4, David M Gershenson5, Mark F Munsell6, Homer A Macapinlac7, Pedro T Ramirez8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Ovarian low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) is a rare and indolent tumor. The utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in monitoring patients with LGSC has not been established. We assessed the accuracy and clinical impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with ovarian LGSC after initial treatment.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients with ovarian LGSC who had undergone 18F-FDG PET/CT scans during follow-up after primary treatment. The impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT on the management plan was assessed. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT findings in the detection of recurrence were calculated. Total lesion glycolysis (TLG) was determined to assess metabolic activity of tumors. Potential prognostic factors for disease-free and overall survival after recurrence were assessed.
RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included in the analysis, 39 with recurrent disease and 9 without recurrence. A total of 91 18F-FDG PET/CT scans were performed, and 30% of these (27/91) had an impact on the management plan. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in the detection of LGSC recurrence were 94%, 100%, and 97%, respectively, for 18F-FDG PET/CT; 89%, 95%, and 93%,respectively, for CT; and 68%, 89%, and 73%, respectively, for serum CA-125. There was no significant difference in sensitivity between PET/CT and CT. Survival after recurrence was poorer in patients with a TLG value greater than 67.7g.
CONCLUSIONS: 18F-FDG PET/CT may provide useful information during the follow-up of patients with LGSC after initial treatment. TLG may be a predictor of survival after recurrence.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  (18)F-FDG PET/CT; Low-grade ovarian carcinoma; Total lesion glycolysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24534359      PMCID: PMC4000233          DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  19 in total

1.  Consensus recommendations for the use of 18F-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in patients in National Cancer Institute Trials.

Authors:  Lalitha K Shankar; John M Hoffman; Steve Bacharach; Michael M Graham; Joel Karp; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Steven Larson; David A Mankoff; Barry A Siegel; Annick Van den Abbeele; Jeffrey Yap; Daniel Sullivan
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  FDG-PET for management of cervical and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Laura J Havrilesky; Shalini L Kulasingam; David B Matchar; Evan R Myers
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Clinical behavior of stage II-IV low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary.

Authors:  David M Gershenson; Charlotte C Sun; Karen H Lu; Robert L Coleman; Anil K Sood; Anais Malpica; Michael T Deavers; Elvio G Silva; Diane C Bodurka
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Testing of two binary grading systems for FIGO stage III serous carcinoma of the ovary and peritoneum.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Seidman; Iren Horkayne-Szakaly; Jonathan A Cosin; Hyung S Ryu; Moutaz Haiba; Charles R Boice; Anna V Yemelyanova
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Use of PET to monitor the response of lung cancer to radiation treatment.

Authors:  Y E Erdi; H Macapinlac; K E Rosenzweig; J L Humm; S M Larson; A K Erdi; E D Yorke
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-07

6.  Prognostic value of preoperative metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Hyun Hoon Chung; Hyun Woo Kwon; Keon Wook Kang; Noh-Hyun Park; Yong-Sang Song; June-Key Chung; Soon-Beom Kang; Jae Weon Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Grading ovarian serous carcinoma using a two-tier system.

Authors:  Anais Malpica; Michael T Deavers; Karen Lu; Diane C Bodurka; Edward N Atkinson; David M Gershenson; Elvio G Silva
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.394

8.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum.

Authors:  Kathleen M Schmeler; Charlotte C Sun; Diane C Bodurka; Michael T Deavers; Anais Malpica; Robert L Coleman; Pedro T Ramirez; David M Gershenson
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  CT and MR accuracy in the detection of tumor recurrence in patients treated for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  L Prayer; C Kainz; J Kramer; R Stiglbauer; H Schurawitzki; M Baldt; W Schima; D Poelzleitner; A Reinthaller; H Koelbl
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Bone metastases in patients with metastatic breast cancer: morphologic and metabolic monitoring of response to systemic therapy with integrated PET/CT.

Authors:  Ukihide Tateishi; Cristina Gamez; Shaheenah Dawood; Henry W D Yeung; Massimo Cristofanilli; Homer A Macapinlac
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  An update on the role of PET/CT and PET/MRI in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Benjapa Khiewvan; Drew A Torigian; Sahra Emamzadehfard; Koosha Paydary; Ali Salavati; Sina Houshmand; Thomas J Werner; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Increase in post-therapy tumor calcification on CT scan is not an indicator of response to therapy in low-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan; Priya Bhosale; Wei Wei; Preetha Ramalingam; Eniola Mudasiru-Dawodu; David Gershenson; Charlotte Sun; Revathy Iyer
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-08

Review 3.  Low-grade epithelial ovarian cancer: what a radiologist should know.

Authors:  Sherif Elsherif; Sanaz Javadi; Chitra Viswanathan; Silvana Faria; Priya Bhosale
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Diagnostic performance of PET/CT and PET/MR in the management of ovarian carcinoma-a literature review.

Authors:  Mayur Virarkar; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan; Anjalie Tara Gulati; Sarah Palmquist; Revathy Iyer; Priya Bhosale
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-11-11

Review 5.  Systematic Review on the Accuracy of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Management of Ovarian Cancer: Is Functional Information Really Needed?

Authors:  Subapriya Suppiah; Wing Liong Chang; Hasyma Abu Hassan; Chalermrat Kaewput; Andi Anggeriana Andi Asri; Fathinul Fikri Ahmad Saad; Abdul Jalil Nordin; Sobhan Vinjamuri
Journal:  World J Nucl Med       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

Review 6.  Low-Grade Serous Carcinoma of the Ovary: The Current Status.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Babaier; Hanan Mal; Waleed Alselwi; Prafull Ghatage
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-10

7.  Clinical and Survival Impact of FDG PET in Patients with Suspicion of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A 6-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Daniela Rusu; Thomas Carlier; Mathilde Colombié; Dorothée Goulon; Vincent Fleury; Nicolas Rousseau; Dominique Berton-Rigaud; Isabelle Jaffre; Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré; Loic Campion; Caroline Rousseau
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2015-07-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.