Whitney N Ajie1, Karen M Chapman-Novakofski2. 1. Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois. Electronic address: whitney.ajie@gmail.com. 2. Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate recent research regarding the use of computer-based nutrition education interventions targeting adolescent overweight and obesity. METHODS: Online databases were systematically searched using key words, and bibliographies of related articles were manually searched. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied and included studies evaluated for their ability to achieve their objectives and for quality using the Nutrition Evidence Library appraisal guidelines for research design and implementation. RESULTS: Of the 15 studies included, 10 were randomized controlled trials. Two studies targeted weight loss, 2 targeted weight maintenance, and 11 targeted dietary improvement with or without physical activity. At least half of in-school (60%) and nonschool interventions (80%) exhibited significantly positive effects on nutrition- or obesity-related variables. Small changes in diet, physical activity, knowledge, and self-efficacy were shown; however, few results were sustained long term. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations included application of health behavior theory and computer tailoring for feedback messages. Future research should include thorough description of intervention content (messages, theory, multimedia, etc.), application of rigorous methodology, as well as consideration of covariates such as parental involvement and gender. With further research and evidentiary support, this approach to obesity-related nutrition education has the potential to be successful.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate recent research regarding the use of computer-based nutrition education interventions targeting adolescent overweight and obesity. METHODS: Online databases were systematically searched using key words, and bibliographies of related articles were manually searched. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied and included studies evaluated for their ability to achieve their objectives and for quality using the Nutrition Evidence Library appraisal guidelines for research design and implementation. RESULTS: Of the 15 studies included, 10 were randomized controlled trials. Two studies targeted weight loss, 2 targeted weight maintenance, and 11 targeted dietary improvement with or without physical activity. At least half of in-school (60%) and nonschool interventions (80%) exhibited significantly positive effects on nutrition- or obesity-related variables. Small changes in diet, physical activity, knowledge, and self-efficacy were shown; however, few results were sustained long term. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations included application of health behavior theory and computer tailoring for feedback messages. Future research should include thorough description of intervention content (messages, theory, multimedia, etc.), application of rigorous methodology, as well as consideration of covariates such as parental involvement and gender. With further research and evidentiary support, this approach to obesity-related nutrition education has the potential to be successful.
Authors: Raquel de Melo Boff; Ronald Patrick Araujo Liboni; Igor Pacheco de Azevedo Batista; Lauren Heineck de Souza; Margareth da Silva Oliveira Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2016-08-19 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: Chelsea L Kracht; Melinda Hutchesson; Mavra Ahmed; Andre Matthias Müller; Lee M Ashton; Hannah M Brown; Ann DeSmet; Carol A Maher; Chelsea E Mauch; Corneel Vandelanotte; Zenong Yin; Megan Whatnall; Camille E Short; Amanda E Staiano Journal: Obes Rev Date: 2021-09-02 Impact factor: 9.213
Authors: Karolina Horodyska; Aleksandra Luszczynska; Matthijs van den Berg; Marieke Hendriksen; Gun Roos; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij; Johannes Brug Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-01-21 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Carol Byrd-Bredbenner; FanFan Wu; Kim Spaccarotella; Virginia Quick; Jennifer Martin-Biggers; Yingting Zhang Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2017-07-11 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Andrew W Tu; Allison W Watts; Jean-Pierre Chanoine; Constadina Panagiotopoulos; Josie Geller; Rollin Brant; Susan I Barr; Louise Mâsse Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 3.295