Literature DB >> 24534166

Oral fat perception is related with body mass index, preference and consumption of high-fat foods.

Nina R Martínez-Ruiz1, José A López-Díaz2, Abraham Wall-Medrano2, Jorge A Jiménez-Castro3, Ofelia Angulo4.   

Abstract

Oral sensory perception may play an important role in food preferences, driving food intake and energy balance. Fat perceived in oral cavity has been associated with satiety and homeostatic signals. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that fat oral-intensity perception may be associated with BMI, food preferences and consumption of fat-rich foods. The ability to perceive linoleic acid at different concentrations by intensity scaling was measured in young adults (n=121), characterized by anthropometric measurements such as body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC) and total body fat (TBF) percentage. Additionally, dietary habits were recorded online during 35days using a questionnaire designed according to the 24-hour recall and the food diary methods. Finally, food preferences were evaluated online using a nine-point hedonic scale. Taste sensitivity (intensity scaling with suprathreshold concentrations) was estimated with different linoleic acid concentrations using a linear scale of 150mm labeled at the ends. Four groups were established after the ratings for oral-intensity perception of linoleic acid: quartile high ratings (QH), quartile medium-high ratings (QMH), quartile medium-low ratings (QML) and quartile low ratings (QL). Participants with high-intensity ratings for linoleic acid (QH) had lower BMI (p=0.04) and waist circumference (WC) (p=0.03) values than participants in the QL group. High-fat foods (foods with more than 20% of energy from lipids such as fast foods and Mexican street foods) were less preferred by participants with high-intensity ratings for linoleic acid (QH) than by participants with medium- (QMH, QML) and low-(QL) intensity ratings (p<0.01). Also, participants with high-intensity ratings for linoleic acid (QH) presented lower consumption of high-fat foods like fast foods (p=0.04) and Mexican street foods (p=0.03) than subjects with medium- (QMH, QML) and low-(QL) intensity ratings. Overall, these data suggest that the participant's intensity ratings for oral perception of linoleic acid were inversely correlated with BMI, WC, preference and consumption of high-fat foods such as fast foods and Mexican street foods, and it may serve as a predisposing factor for fat consumption in humans.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body mass index; Fat; Fatty acid; Intensity perception; Intensity scaling; Preference

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24534166     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  17 in total

1.  The influence of herbs, spices, and regular sausage and chicken consumption on liking of reduced fat breakfast and lunch items.

Authors:  Sarit Polsky; Jimikaye Beck; Rebecca A Stark; Zhaoxing Pan; James O Hill; John C Peters
Journal:  J Food Sci       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.167

2.  Oral Signals of Short and Long Chain Fatty Acids: Parallel Taste Pathways to Identify Microbes and Triglycerides.

Authors:  Emily C Hanselman; Nicholas J Amado; Paul A S Breslin
Journal:  Curr Opin Physiol       Date:  2021-01-19

Review 3.  Comparisons of Fatty Acid Taste Detection Thresholds in People Who Are Lean vs. Overweight or Obese: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Robin M Tucker; Kathryn A Kaiser; Mariel A Parman; Brandon J George; David B Allison; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Relative Effects of Sensory Modalities and Importance of Fatty Acid Sensitivity on Fat Perception in a Real Food Model.

Authors:  Xirui Zhou; Yuchi Shen; Jane K Parker; Orla B Kennedy; Lisa Methven
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 1.833

5.  Fat Sensation: Fatty Acid Taste and Olfaction Sensitivity and the Link with Disinhibited Eating Behaviour.

Authors:  Sophie Kindleysides; Kathryn L Beck; Daniel C I Walsh; Lisa Henderson; Shakeela N Jayasinghe; Matt Golding; Bernhard H Breier
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  The Role of the Japanese Traditional Diet in Healthy and Sustainable Dietary Patterns around the World.

Authors:  Ana San Gabriel; Kumiko Ninomiya; Hisayuki Uneyama
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Food Preferences in Dogs: Effect of Dietary Composition and Intrinsic Variables on Diet Selection.

Authors:  Raúl A Alegría-Morán; Sergio A Guzmán-Pino; Juan Ignacio Egaña; Carem Muñoz; Jaime Figueroa
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  No Difference in Perceived Intensity of Linoleic Acid in the Oral Cavity between Obese and Nonobese Individuals.

Authors:  Robin M Tucker; Tiffany M Nuessle; Nicole L Garneau; Gregory Smutzer; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  Effects of Salt and Fat Combinations on Taste Preference and Perception.

Authors:  Dieuwerke P Bolhuis; Lisa P Newman; Russell S J Keast
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 3.160

10.  Fat Taste Sensitivity Is Associated with Short-Term and Habitual Fat Intake.

Authors:  Andrew Costanzo; Liliana Orellana; Caryl Nowson; Konsta Duesing; Russell Keast
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.