Literature DB >> 24534140

Crossmodal enhancement of visual orientation discrimination by looming sounds requires functional activation of primary visual areas: a case study.

Roberto Cecere1, Vincenzo Romei2, Caterina Bertini3, Elisabetta Làdavas4.   

Abstract

Approaching or looming sounds are salient, potentially threatening stimuli with particular impact on visual processing. The early crossmodal effects by looming sounds (Romei, Murray, Cappe, & Thut, 2009) and their selective impact on visual orientation discrimination (Leo, Romei, Freeman, Ladavas, & Driver, 2011) suggest that these multisensory interactions may take place already within low-level visual cortices. To investigate this hypothesis, we tested a patient (SDV) with bilateral occipital lesion and spared residual portions of V1/V2. Accordingly, SDV׳s visual perimetry revealed blindness of the central visual field with some residual peripheral vision. In two experiments we tested for the influence of looming vs. receding and stationary sounds on SDV׳s line orientation discrimination (orientation discrimination experiment) and visual detection abilities (detection experiment) in the preserved or blind portions of the visual field, corresponding to spared and lesioned areas of V1, respectively. In the visual orientation discrimination experiment we found that SDV visual orientation sensitivity significantly improved for visual targets paired with looming sounds but only for lines presented in the partially preserved visual field. In the visual detection experiment, where SDV was required to simply detect the same stimuli presented in the orientation discrimination experiment, a generalised sound-induced visual improvement both in the intact and in blind portion of the visual field was observed. These results provide direct evidence that early visual areas are critically involved in crossmodal modulation of visual orientation sensitivity by looming sounds. Thus, a lesion in V1 prevents the enhancement of visual orientation sensitivity. In contrast, the same lesion does not prevent the visual detection enhancement by a sound, probably due to alternative visual pathways (e.g. retino-colliculo-extrastriate) which are usually spared in these patients and able to mediate the crossmodal enhancement of basic visual abilities such as detection.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cortical blindness; Looming sounds; Multisensory integration; Visual detection; Visual orientation discrimination

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24534140     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  9 in total

Review 1.  The COGs (context, object, and goals) in multisensory processing.

Authors:  Sanne ten Oever; Vincenzo Romei; Nienke van Atteveldt; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Micah M Murray; Pawel J Matusz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Are auditory cues special? Evidence from cross-modal distractor-induced blindness.

Authors:  Lea Kern; Michael Niedeggen
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 2.157

3.  Visual cortex responds to sound onset and offset during passive listening.

Authors:  David Brang; John Plass; Aleksandra Sherman; William C Stacey; Vibhangini S Wasade; Marcia Grabowecky; EunSeon Ahn; Vernon L Towle; James X Tao; Shasha Wu; Naoum P Issa; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.974

4.  Being First Matters: Topographical Representational Similarity Analysis of ERP Signals Reveals Separate Networks for Audiovisual Temporal Binding Depending on the Leading Sense.

Authors:  Roberto Cecere; Joachim Gross; Ashleigh Willis; Gregor Thut
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Compensatory Cross-Modal Plasticity Persists After Sight Restoration.

Authors:  Theresa G Mowad; Aimee E Willett; Mani Mahmoudian; Mikhail Lipin; Armin Heinecke; Albert M Maguire; Jean Bennett; Manzar Ashtari
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Compensatory Recovery after Multisensory Stimulation in Hemianopic Patients: Behavioral and Neurophysiological Components.

Authors:  Paolo A Grasso; Elisabetta Làdavas; Caterina Bertini
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-24

Review 7.  Multisensory Stimulation to Improve Low- and Higher-Level Sensory Deficits after Stroke: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Angelica Maria Tinga; Johanna Maria Augusta Visser-Meily; Maarten Jeroen van der Smagt; Stefan Van der Stigchel; Raymond van Ee; Tanja Cornelia Wilhelmina Nijboer
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 7.444

8.  Behavioural evidence for separate mechanisms of audiovisual temporal binding as a function of leading sensory modality.

Authors:  Roberto Cecere; Joachim Gross; Gregor Thut
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  An unperceived acoustic stimulus decreases reaction time to visual information in a patient with cortical deafness.

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Dana Maslovat; Kimitaka Kaga
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.