Deepak Kumar1, Alexander Dillon2, Lorenzo Nardo3, Thomas M Link4, Sharmila Majumdar5, Richard B Souza6. 1. Musculoskeletal Quantitative Imaging Research Group, Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California-San Francisco, 1700 4th St, Suite 203, Byers Hall, UCSF Mission Bay, San Francisco, CA 94158(∗). Electronic address: deepak.kumar@ucsf.edu. 2. Musculoskeletal Quantitative Imaging Research Group, Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA(†). 3. Musculoskeletal Quantitative Imaging Research Group, Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA(‡). 4. Musculoskeletal Quantitative Imaging Research Group, Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA(§). 5. Musculoskeletal Quantitative Imaging Research Group, Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA(¶). 6. Musculoskeletal Quantitative Imaging Research Group, Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, and Physical Therapy, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA(#).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the differences in hip movement patterns during different daily and athletic activities in persons with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) with and without cartilage lesions compared with control subjects in a preliminary study. DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study using a cross-sectional design. SETTING: Research institution with a tertiary care medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen subjects [M:F, 13:2; age, 31.6 ± 9.7 years (range, 22-52 years); body mass index, 24.9 ± 4.6 (range, 18.8-38.4); FAI:control, 7:8]. METHODS: All subjects had 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of the hip and also underwent 3-dimensional motion capture during walking, deep-squat, and drop-landing tasks. Experienced radiologists graded cartilage lesions on clinical magnetic resonance images. OUTCOMES: Peak kinematic and kinetic variables were compared between subjects who did and did not have FAI, and subjects who had FAI and cartilage lesions were compared with subjects who did not have cartilage lesions. RESULTS: Subjects who had FAI demonstrated no significant differences for walking or drop landing compared with control subjects. However, during the deep-squat task, subjects with FAI adducted more and had a greater internal rotation moment. Subjects who had cartilage lesions in the presence of a cam lesion demonstrated (1) no difference for walking; (2) greater adduction, greater internal rotation moment, and lower transverse plane range of motion during the deep-squat task; and (3) greater adduction and lower internal rotation during the drop-landing task compared with subjects who did not have cartilage lesions. CONCLUSIONS: We observed differences in movement patterns between subjects who had FAI compared with control subjects. However, the differences were more pronounced between subjects with FAI who had cartilage lesions compared with subjects who did not have cartilage lesions. These findings highlight the importance of understanding the complex interplay between bony morphologic features, cartilage lesions, and movement patterns in persons with cam-type FAI.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the differences in hip movement patterns during different daily and athletic activities in persons with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) with and without cartilage lesions compared with control subjects in a preliminary study. DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study using a cross-sectional design. SETTING: Research institution with a tertiary care medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen subjects [M:F, 13:2; age, 31.6 ± 9.7 years (range, 22-52 years); body mass index, 24.9 ± 4.6 (range, 18.8-38.4); FAI:control, 7:8]. METHODS: All subjects had 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of the hip and also underwent 3-dimensional motion capture during walking, deep-squat, and drop-landing tasks. Experienced radiologists graded cartilage lesions on clinical magnetic resonance images. OUTCOMES: Peak kinematic and kinetic variables were compared between subjects who did and did not have FAI, and subjects who had FAI and cartilage lesions were compared with subjects who did not have cartilage lesions. RESULTS: Subjects who had FAI demonstrated no significant differences for walking or drop landing compared with control subjects. However, during the deep-squat task, subjects with FAI adducted more and had a greater internal rotation moment. Subjects who had cartilage lesions in the presence of a cam lesion demonstrated (1) no difference for walking; (2) greater adduction, greater internal rotation moment, and lower transverse plane range of motion during the deep-squat task; and (3) greater adduction and lower internal rotation during the drop-landing task compared with subjects who did not have cartilage lesions. CONCLUSIONS: We observed differences in movement patterns between subjects who had FAI compared with control subjects. However, the differences were more pronounced between subjects with FAI who had cartilage lesions compared with subjects who did not have cartilage lesions. These findings highlight the importance of understanding the complex interplay between bony morphologic features, cartilage lesions, and movement patterns in persons with cam-type FAI.
Authors: Victor M Ilizaliturri; J W Thomas Byrd; Thomas G Sampson; Carlos A Guanche; Marc J Philippon; Bryan T Kelly; Michael Dienst; Rodrigo Mardones; Paul Shonnard; Christopher M Larson Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2008-02-01 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Reva C Lawrence; David T Felson; Charles G Helmick; Lesley M Arnold; Hyon Choi; Richard A Deyo; Sherine Gabriel; Rosemarie Hirsch; Marc C Hochberg; Gene G Hunder; Joanne M Jordan; Jeffrey N Katz; Hilal Maradit Kremers; Frederick Wolfe Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2008-01
Authors: John C Clohisy; Evan R Knaus; Devyani M Hunt; John M Lesher; Marcie Harris-Hayes; Heidi Prather Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2009-01-07 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Michael A Samaan; Hsiang-Ling Teng; Deepak Kumar; Sonia Lee; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar; Richard B Souza Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2015-08-11 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: Penny R Atkins; Niccolo M Fiorentino; Joseph A Hartle; Stephen K Aoki; Christopher L Peters; K Bo Foreman; Andrew E Anderson Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Michael A Samaan; Benedikt J Schwaiger; Matthew C Gallo; Kiyoshi Sada; Thomas M Link; Alan L Zhang; Sharmila Majumdar; Richard B Souza Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2016-12-22 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Valentina Pedoia; Michael A Samaan; Gaurav Inamdar; Matthew C Gallo; Richard B Souza; Sharmila Majumdar Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2017-08-11 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Michael A Samaan; Alan L Zhang; Tijana Popovic; Valentina Pedoia; Sharmila Majumdar; Richard B Souza Journal: J Biomech Date: 2018-12-23 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Lindsey Brown-Taylor; Brittany Schroeder; Cara L Lewis; Jennifer Perry; Timothy E Hewett; John Ryan; Stephanie Di Stasi Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2020-04-13 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Marcie Harris-Hayes; Sylvia Czuppon; Linda R Van Dillen; Karen Steger-May; Shirley Sahrmann; Mario Schootman; Gretchen B Salsich; John C Clohisy; Michael J Mueller Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2016-04-26 Impact factor: 4.751