Literature DB >> 24534001

The impact of recent advances in research on arsenic cancer risk assessment.

P Robinan Gentry1, Harvey J Clewell2, Tracy B Greene3, Allison C Franzen4, Janice W Yager5.   

Abstract

Scientific debate surrounds the regulatory approach for evaluating carcinogenic risk of arsenic compounds. The arsenic ambient water quality criteria (AWQC), based on the assumption of a linear mode of action for skin cancer risk, results in an allowable limit of 0.018ppb in ambient waters; the drinking water Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) was determined using a similar linear approach. Integration of results from recent studies investigating arsenic's mode of action provide the basis for a change in the approach for conducting an arsenic cancer risk assessment. Results provide support for a concentration demonstrating a dose-dependent transition in response from those representing adaptive changes to those that may be key events in the development of cancer endpoints. While additional information is needed, integration of current research results provides insight for a new quantitative cancer risk assessment methodology as an alternative toxicologically-based dose response (BBDR) cancer modeling. Integration of the new experimental results, combined with epidemiological evidence, support a dose-dependent transition concentration of approximately 0.1μM arsenic. Some uncertainties remain; additional information from chronic in vitro studies underway is needed. Results to date also provide initial insight into variability in population response at low arsenic exposures.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive; Arsenic; Cancer risk; Dose–response; Non-linear

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24534001     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  6 in total

Review 1.  State of the science review of the health effects of inorganic arsenic: Perspectives for future research.

Authors:  Paul B Tchounwou; Clement G Yedjou; Udensi K Udensi; Maricica Pacurari; Jacqueline J Stevens; Anita K Patlolla; Felicite Noubissi; Sanjay Kumar
Journal:  Environ Toxicol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.119

2.  Protection of Nrf2 against arsenite-induced oxidative damage is regulated by the cyclic guanosine monophosphate-protein kinase G signaling pathway.

Authors:  Chengzhi Chen; Xuejun Jiang; Shiyan Gu; Yanhao Lai; Yuan Liu; Zunzhen Zhang
Journal:  Environ Toxicol       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 4.119

3.  Arsenic-exposed Keratinocytes Exhibit Differential microRNAs Expression Profile; Potential Implication of miR-21, miR-200a and miR-141 in Melanoma Pathway.

Authors:  Horacio Gonzalez; Carolina Lema; Robert A Kirken; Rosa A Maldonado; Armando Varela-Ramirez; Renato J Aguilera
Journal:  Clin Cancer Drugs       Date:  2015

4.  In Vitro Scratch Assay to Demonstrate Effects of Arsenic on Skin Cell Migration.

Authors:  Bronson I Pinto; Nathan D Cruz; Oscar R Lujan; Catherine R Propper; Robert S Kellar
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2019-02-23       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Assessment of arsenic removal efficiency by an iron oxide-coated sand filter process.

Authors:  Arianna Callegari; Navarro Ferronato; Elena Cristina Rada; Andrea G Capodaglio; Vincenzo Torretta
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Arsenic‑induced BRCA1 CpG promoter methylation is associated with the downregulation of ERα and resistance to tamoxifen in MCF7 breast cancer cells and mouse mammary tumor xenografts.

Authors:  Ornella I Selmin; Micah G Donovan; Bethany Skovan; Gillian D Paine-Murieta; Donato F Romagnolo
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 5.650

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.