Literature DB >> 24533917

Normal values for solid-state esophageal high-resolution manometry in a European population; an overview of all current metrics.

P W Weijenborg1, B F Kessing, A J P M Smout, A J Bredenoord.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) allows accurate evaluation of esophageal motility. Normal values for HRM were established in the United States and several new parameters were introduced since. We aimed to provide a complete set of normal values for HRM obtained in a European population, including all current metrics used to describe the function of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES), the esophageal body, and the esophagogastric junction (EGJ).
METHODS: Fifty healthy volunteers underwent esophageal HRM. Subjects swallowed 10 liquid boluses in supine position, after which UES, EGJ, and contraction wave parameters were evaluated. Mean and median values with 5-95th percentile ranges were calculated. KEY
RESULTS: The normative thresholds (5-95th percentile) for the various parameters were; UES resting pressure 34.6-137.7 mmHg, UES residual pressure 0.0-8.5 mmHg, UES 0.2-s integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) 0.0-14.5 mmHg, EGJ length 3.1-6.3 cm, EGJ resting pressure 3.0-31.2 mmHg, EGJ 4-s IRP 2.0-15.5 mmHg, intrabolus pressure (IBP) 6.6-19.5 mmHg, distal contractile integral 178-2828 mmHg*s*cm, contractile front velocity (CFV) 2.9-5.9 cm s(-1) , distal latency 5.4-8.5 s, and transition zone length 0.0-8.2 cm. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Most HRM parameters assessed in this study resemble the previously described values on which the current criteria are based, supporting the widespread use of these criteria for clinical purposes. However, vigor of the esophageal contraction was lower and transition zone length larger than in previous reports. Peristaltic breaks occur frequently in healthy subjects.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  esophageal motility; esophagus; high-resolution manometry; normal values

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24533917     DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  32 in total

1.  Pharmacologic interrogation of patients with esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction using amyl nitrite.

Authors:  Arash Babaei; Sadaf Shad; Aniko Szabo; Benson T Massey
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Comparison of two high-resolution manometry software systems in evaluating esophageal motor function.

Authors:  A Rengarajan; J Drapekin; A Patel; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Significant pressure differences between solid-state and water-perfused systems in lower esophageal sphincter measurement.

Authors:  Philipp Gehwolf; Ronald A Hinder; Kenneth R DeVault; Michael Edlinger; Heinz F Wykypiel; Paul J Klingler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  The Chicago Classification 3.0 Results in More Normal Findings and Fewer Hypotensive Findings With No Difference in Other Diagnoses.

Authors:  H Monrroy; D Cisternas; C Bilder; A Ditaranto; J Remes-Troche; A Meixueiro; M A Zavala; J Serra; I Marín; A Ruiz de León; J Pérez de la Serna; A Hani; A Leguizamo; L Abrahao; R Coello; M A Valdovinos
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 5.  Chicago Classification of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Applications and Limits in Adults and Pediatric Patients with Esophageal Symptoms.

Authors:  Kornilia Nikaki; Joanne Li Shen Ooi; Daniel Sifrim
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-11

6.  Normal Values of High-Resolution Manometry in Supine and Upright Positions in a Thai Population.

Authors:  Pitichote Hiranyatheb; Suriya Chakkaphak; Supphamat Chirnaksorn; Pattaraporn Lekhaka; Kaimuk Petsrikun; Kornkanok Somboonpun
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Characterization of Esophageal Motility Disorders in Children Presenting With Dysphagia Using High-Resolution Manometry.

Authors:  Francis Edeani; Adeel Malik; Ajay Kaul
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2017-03

Review 8.  High-Resolution Pharyngeal Manometry and Impedance: Protocols and Metrics-Recommendations of a High-Resolution Pharyngeal Manometry International Working Group.

Authors:  Taher I Omari; Michelle Ciucci; Kristin Gozdzikowska; Ester Hernández; Katherine Hutcheson; Corinne Jones; Julia Maclean; Nogah Nativ-Zeltzer; Emily Plowman; Nicole Rogus-Pulia; Nathalie Rommel; Ashli O'Rourke
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 9.  [High-resolution manometry of pharyngeal swallowing dynamics].

Authors:  M Jungheim; M Ptok
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.284

10.  High-Resolution Manometry Evaluation of the Pharynx and Upper Esophageal Sphincter Motility in Patients with Achalasia.

Authors:  Mariano A Menezes; Fernando A M Herbella; Marco G Patti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.