Literature DB >> 2453334

Surface myoelectric signal cross-talk among muscles of the leg.

C J De Luca1, R Merletti.   

Abstract

Surface myoelectric signals were detected from the skin surface above the tibialis anterior muscle, the peroneus brevis muscle, the soleus muscle and the tibial bone during selective maximal electrical stimulation of the tibialis anterior muscle in 12 normal subjects. The double differential technique developed by Broman et al. (1985) was used to determine if the detected signal was due to volume conduction from the tibialis anterior fibers. The peak-to-peak (PP), average rectified (ARV) and root mean square (RMS) amplitudes of the M waves were computed for each detection location. The values detected on the tibial bone, on the peroneus and on the soleus muscles were normalized with respect to those detected on the tibialis anterior and ranged from 4.8% to 33.0% (PP), 4.7% to 36.0% (ARV), and 7.7% to 37.4% (RMS) for the tibial bone area; from 4.0% to 20.0% (PP), 3.5% to 10.0% (ARV), and 3.0% to 10.0% (RMS) for the peroneus brevis muscle area; and from 3.0% to 8.0% (PP), 3.4% to 9.1% (ARV), and 2.0% to 9.8% (RMS) for the soleus muscle area. Neither peak-to-peak values, average rectified values nor root mean square values appeared to be correlated with leg size. It is concluded that a surface myoelectric signal detected on the skin above a leg muscle and having a peak-to-peak amplitude of up to 16.6% of a signal detected above a neighboring muscle may be due to cross-talk rather than to activation of the muscle below the electrode.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2453334     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(88)90169-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  30 in total

1.  Surface electromyography and mechanomyography recording: a new differential composite probe.

Authors:  B Gregori; E Galié; N Accornero
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Detection of motor unit action potentials with surface electrodes: influence of electrode size and spacing.

Authors:  A J Fuglevand; D A Winter; A E Patla; D Stashuk
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Surface electrodes are not sufficient to detect neurotonic discharges: observations in a porcine model and clinical review of deltoid electromyographic monitoring using multiple electrodes.

Authors:  Stanley A Skinner; Ensor E Transfeldt; Kay Savik
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Afferent sensory mechanisms involved in jaw gape-related muscle activation in unilateral biting.

Authors:  Thomas Riccardo Morneburg; Sebastian Döhla; Manfred Wichmann; Peter Alfred Pröschel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Adaptive common average filtering for myocontrol applications.

Authors:  Hubertus Rehbaum; Dario Farina
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Comparison of electromyography and joint moment as indicators of co-contraction.

Authors:  Brian A Knarr; Joseph A Zeni; Jill S Higginson
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 2.368

Review 7.  The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG: an update.

Authors:  Dario Farina; Roberto Merletti; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2014-10-02

8.  Robust and accurate decoding of motoneuron behaviour and prediction of the resulting force output.

Authors:  Christopher K Thompson; Francesco Negro; Michael D Johnson; Matthew R Holmes; Laura Miller McPherson; Randall K Powers; Dario Farina; Charles J Heckman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-06-09       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Different activations of the soleus and gastrocnemii muscles in response to various types of stance perturbation in man.

Authors:  A Nardone; T Corrà; M Schieppati
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Use of neck strap muscle intermuscular coherence as an indicator of vocal hyperfunction.

Authors:  Cara E Stepp; Robert E Hillman; James T Heaton
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.