| Literature DB >> 24533331 |
Narelle A Dybing1, Patricia A Fleming1, Peter J Adams1.
Abstract
Red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) are the most common and widely distributed wild carnivore worldwide. These predators harbour a wide range of parasites, many of which may have important conservation, agricultural and zoonotic repercussions. This project investigated the occurrence of helminth parasites from the intestines of 147 red foxes across 14 sampling localities of southwest Western Australia. Helminth parasites were detected in 58% of fox intestines: Dipylidium caninum (27.7% of foxes), Uncinaria stenocephala (18.2%), Toxocara canis (14.9%), Spirometra erinaceieuropaei (5.4%), Toxascaris leonina (4.7%), Taenia serialis (1.4%), Taenia hydatigena (0.7%), unidentified Taenia spp. (4.1%), Brachylaima cribbi (0.7%), Plagiorchis maculosus (0.7%) and an Acanthocephalan; family Centrorhynchidae (2.1%). Importantly, two cestodes of agricultural significance, Echinococcus granulosus and Taenia ovis, were not detected in red foxes in this study, despite the presence of suitable intermediate hosts in the diets of these animals. Parasite richness varied from 1-3 species per host, with average parasite number varying from 1-39 worms (across all helminth species). Regression analyses indicated that the presence of four helminth parasites was related to various environmental factors. The presence of S. erinaceieuropaei (p < 0.001), T. leonina (p < 0.01) and U. stenocephala (p < 0.01) was positively associated with average relative humidity which may affect the longevity of infective stages in the environment. The presence of S. erinaceieuropaei and U. stenocephala (p < 0.001) was positively associated with 5-y-average minimum temperature which could reflect poor survival of infective stages through cold winter conditions. The presence of T. canis and U. stenocephala (p < 0.001) was positively associated with the percentage cover of native vegetation at each sampling location, which is likely to reflect transmission from native prey species acting as paratenic hosts. These data identify environmental factors affecting transmission and potential distribution of each parasite taxon, and provide important information increasing our understanding of the potential effects of environmental change on parasite ecology.Entities:
Keywords: Environmental correlates; Helminth parasites; Red fox; Zoonotic
Year: 2013 PMID: 24533331 PMCID: PMC3862530 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2013.04.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl ISSN: 2213-2244 Impact factor: 2.674
Environmental and climatic measures for each sampling location and number of samples collected.
| Location | % Native vegetation cover | Avg. humidity for previous 6 mo (%) | Temperature | 5-y-avg. Annual rainfall (mm) | Avg. rainfall for previous 6 m (mm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-y-avg. Mean (°C) | 5-y-avg. Min. (°C) | 5-y-avg. Max. (°C) | |||||
| Armadale ( | 30.91 | 62.67 | – | 11.1 | 24.3 | 765.88 | 17.13 |
| Boyup brook ( | 37.21 | 70.83 | 23.08 | 8.72 | 22.9 | 587.52 | 10.88 |
| Corrigin ( | 5.91 | 56.17 | 24.3 | 9.96 | 24.3 | 355.5 | 12.67 |
| Darkan ( | 25.52 | 56.17 | 23.08 | 9.74 | 23.08 | 534.86 | 19.47 |
| Dumbleyung ( | 7.83 | 56.17 | 23.08 | 9.74 | 23.08 | 337.84 | 9.21 |
| Frankland ( | 32.05 | 66.5 | 20.5 | 9.5 | 20.5 | 597.2 | 10.17 |
| Gingin ( | 46.36 | 47.67 | 25.58 | 10.62 | 25.28 | 577.76 | 19.17 |
| Katanning ( | 10.86 | 58.33 | 22.58 | 9.14 | 22.18 | 454.44 | 17.77 |
| Kemerton ( | 33.77 | 56.5 | – | 10.78 | 22.84 | 768.54 | 15.05 |
| Mt. Barker ( | 30.04 | 69.67 | 20.64 | 9.72 | 20.64 | 634.66 | 27.35 |
| Nyabing ( | 9.74 | 58.33 | 22.18 | 9.14 | 22.18 | 360.58 | 12.13 |
| Quairading ( | 4.79 | 56 | 25.82 | 10.02 | 25.9 | 340.06 | 15.87 |
| Williams ( | 18.54 | 53.17 | – | 9.68 | 22.84 | 452.46 | 14.9 |
| Woodanilling ( | 10.49 | 58.33 | 22.58 | 9.14 | 22.18 | 417.52 | 14.52 |
Percentage native vegetation cover was calculated within a 30 km radius of each sampling location (data sourced from Shepherd et al., 2001).
Climatic measures were sourced from Bureau of Meteorology (Department of Sustainability, 2010).
Age, weight and sex breakdown of samples collected (n = 147).
| Range | No. of foxes | |
|---|---|---|
| Age cohort | <2 years | 105 |
| 2–4 years | 26 | |
| 4–6 years | 4 | |
| 6–8 years | 3 | |
| Unknown | 9 | |
| Weight | <5 kg | 47 |
| 5–8 kg | 96 | |
| >8 kg | 2 | |
| Male | 80 | |
| Female | 67 | |
Fig. 1Prevalence of helminths in red foxes (n=147) from sampling locations throughout southwest Western Australia. Numbers in parentheses indicate sample size at each location.
Prevalence and parasite intensity of helminth species in red foxes. Species within each Family are sorted in decreasing order of prevalence.
| Phylum | Parasite | Prevalence (%) | Helminth parasite intensity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average | SD | Min | Max | Median | |||
| Nematoda | 18.2 | 17.00 | 17.33 | 1 | 78 | 12 | |
| 14.9 | 7.00 | 7.84 | 1 | 34 | 4 | ||
| 4.7 | 1.00 | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Unknown roundworm | 1.4 | 1.00 | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Unknown hookworm | 0.7 | 1.00 | – | 1 | 1 | – | |
| Cestoda | 27.7 | 8.00 | 12.14 | 1 | 51 | 2 | |
| 5.4 | 3.00 | 1.98 | 1 | 6 | 3 | ||
| 1.4 | 39.00 | 49.50 | 4 | 74 | 39 | ||
| 0.7 | 1.00 | – | 1 | 1 | – | ||
| 4.1 | 1.00 | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Trematoda | 0.7 | 6.00 | – | 6 | 6 | – | |
| 0.7 | 8.00 | – | 8 | 8 | – | ||
| Unknown fluke | 0.7 | 1.00 | – | 1 | 1 | – | |
| Acanthocephala | Centrorhynchidae | 2.1 | 2.00 | 1.73 | 1 | 4 | 1 |
Identified to family only.
Summary of five separate backwards stepwise multiple logistic regression analyses carried out to determine factors that were associated with the presence/absence of the five most prevalent parasite species. This table shows beta coefficient values ± standard errors.
| Parasite species | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Environmental factors | |||||
| % Native vegetation cover (30km radius) | – | – | 0.455 ± 0.079 | – | 0.493 ± 0.073 |
| Avg. monthly rainfall- previous 6 mo (mm) | – | – | – | – | – |
| 5-y-avg. annual rainfall (mm) | – | – | – | – | – |
| Avg. humidity- previous 6 mo (%) | – | 0.574 ± 0.115 | – | 0.285 ± 0.085 | 0.343 ± 0.10 |
| 5-y-avg. mean temp. (°C) | – | – | – | – | – |
| 5-y-avg. min temp. (°C) | – | 0.494 ± 0.115 | – | – | 0.364 ± 0.103 |
| 5-y-avg. max temp. (°C) | – | – | – | – | – |
| Host factors | |||||
| Sex | – | – | – | – | – |
| Head/body length (cm) | – | – | – | – | – |
| Pes length (cm) | – | – | – | – | – |
| Body mass (minus GI tract mass, kg) | – | – | – | – | – |
| Age (years) | – | – | – | – | – |
Factors that were eliminated as part of the backwards stepwise regression are indicated with –; significant factors are indicated with asterisks.
p < 0.01.
p < 0.001.
Pearson’s correlation matrix with a Bonferroni correction between parasites in red foxes (n = 147) based on presence/absence data. Only parasites present in at least 3 foxes were included in the analysis.
| 1 | ||||||
| −0.052 | 1 | |||||
| −0.149 | 0.102 | 1 | ||||
| −0.091 | −0.087 | 0.067 | 1 | |||
| −0.139 | −0.046 | 0.228 | −0.004 | 1 | ||
| −0.217 | −0.098 | 0.351 | 0.244 | 0.224 | 1 |
Statistically significant correlations are indicated with asterisks.
p < 0.01.
p < 0.001.
Fig. 2Prevalence of Uncinaria stenocephala and Dipylidium caninum from red foxes at each sampling location.