Christina S McCrae1, Adam D Bramoweth2, Jacob Williams1, Alicia Roth1, Caterina Mosti3. 1. Department of Clinical & Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. 2. VISN 4 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC) VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA. 3. Department of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To examine health care utilization (HCU) and costs following brief cognitive behavioral treatment for insomnia (bCBTi). METHODS: Reviewed medical records of 84 outpatients [mean age = 54.25 years (19.08); 58% women] treated in a behavioral sleep medicine clinic (2005-2010) based in an accredited sleep disorders center. Six indicators of HCU and costs were obtained: estimated total and outpatient costs, estimated primary care visits, CPT costs, number of office visits, and number of medications. All patients completed ≥ 1 session of bCBTi. Those who attended ≥ 3 sessions were considered completers (n = 37), and completers with significant sleep improvements were considered responders (n = 32). RESULTS: For completers and responders, all HCU and cost variables, except number of medications, significantly decreased (ps < 0.05) or trended towards decrease at post-treatment. Completers had average decreases in CPT costs of $200 and estimated total costs of $75. Responders had average decreases in CPT costs of $210. No significant decreases occurred for non-completers. CONCLUSIONS: bCBTi can reduce HCU and costs. Response to bCBTi resulted in greater reduction of HCU and costs. While limited by small sample size and non-normal data distribution, the findings highlight the need for greater dissemination of bCBTi for several reasons: a high percentage of completers responded to treatment, as few as 3 sessions can result in significant improvements in insomnia severity, bCBTi can be delivered by novice clinicians, and health care costs can reduce following treatment. Insomnia remains an undertreated disorder, and brief behavioral treatments can help to increase access to care and reduce the burden of insomnia.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To examine health care utilization (HCU) and costs following brief cognitive behavioral treatment for insomnia (bCBTi). METHODS: Reviewed medical records of 84 outpatients [mean age = 54.25 years (19.08); 58% women] treated in a behavioral sleep medicine clinic (2005-2010) based in an accredited sleep disorders center. Six indicators of HCU and costs were obtained: estimated total and outpatient costs, estimated primary care visits, CPT costs, number of office visits, and number of medications. All patients completed ≥ 1 session of bCBTi. Those who attended ≥ 3 sessions were considered completers (n = 37), and completers with significant sleep improvements were considered responders (n = 32). RESULTS: For completers and responders, all HCU and cost variables, except number of medications, significantly decreased (ps < 0.05) or trended towards decrease at post-treatment. Completers had average decreases in CPT costs of $200 and estimated total costs of $75. Responders had average decreases in CPT costs of $210. No significant decreases occurred for non-completers. CONCLUSIONS:bCBTi can reduce HCU and costs. Response to bCBTi resulted in greater reduction of HCU and costs. While limited by small sample size and non-normal data distribution, the findings highlight the need for greater dissemination of bCBTi for several reasons: a high percentage of completers responded to treatment, as few as 3 sessions can result in significant improvements in insomnia severity, bCBTi can be delivered by novice clinicians, and health care costs can reduce following treatment. Insomnia remains an undertreated disorder, and brief behavioral treatments can help to increase access to care and reduce the burden of insomnia.
Entities:
Keywords:
Insomnia; brief cognitive behavioral treatment; costs; health care utilization; medication; physician visits
Authors: Andrew D Krystal; Alan Lankford; H Heith Durrence; Elizabeth Ludington; Philip Jochelson; Roberta Rogowski; Thomas Roth Journal: Sleep Date: 2011-10-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Anne Germain; Douglas E Moul; Peter L Franzen; Jean M Miewald; Charles F Reynolds; Timothy H Monk; Daniel J Buysse Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2006-10-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Mark R Rosekind; Kevin B Gregory; Melissa M Mallis; Summer L Brandt; Brian Seal; Debra Lerner Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Amy Cheung; Carolyn Dewa; Erin E Michalak; Gina Browne; Anthony Levitt; Robert D Levitan; Murray W Enns; Rachel L Morehouse; Raymond W Lam Journal: Depress Res Treat Date: 2012-10-18
Authors: Nancy S Redeker; Sangchoon Jeon; Laura Andrews; John Cline; Daniel Jacoby; Vahid Mohsenin Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2015-10-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Scott G Williams; Jacob Collen; Emerson Wickwire; Christopher J Lettieri; Vincent Mysliwiec Journal: Curr Psychiatry Rep Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 5.285
Authors: Christina S McCrae; Ashley F Curtis; Amelia Cottle; David B Beversdorf; Joel Shenker; Brian P Mooney; Mihail Popescu; Marilyn Rantz; Maureen Groer; Phyllis Stein; Mojgan Golzy; Melanie A Stearns; Angelynn Simenson; Neetu Nair; Meredeth A Rowe Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2022-06-14
Authors: Grace E Dean; Carleara Weiss; Carla R Jungquist; Michelle L Klimpt; Rana Alameri; Patricia A Ziegler; Lynn M Steinbrenner; Elisabeth U Dexter; Samjot S Dhillon; Joseph F Lucke; Suzanne S Dickerson Journal: Behav Sleep Med Date: 2019-10-31 Impact factor: 2.964