Gaurav Kapoor1, D P Vats2, J K S Parihar3. 1. Classified Specialist (Ophthalmology), 166 MH, C/o 56 APO, India. 2. MS (Ophth), Ant Seg Microsurgeon, House No 750, Sector 12 A, Panchkula, Haryana, India. 3. Consultant (Ophthalmology & Anterior Segment Microsurgeon), Army Hospital (R&R), Delhi Cantt, India.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Development and standardization of computerized color vision testing as a replacement for Martin Lantern test. Non-randomized comparative trial. METHODS: All candidates of SSB, Allahabad, reporting for SMB underwent color vision testing at the eye dept by computerized eye test and currently available tests. RESULTS: All candidates were subjected to Ishihara chart testing and those found to be CP III were subjected to the confirmatory test on Martin Lantern and the Software. Candidates requiring CP I standards for eligibility were tested on the same on Martin Lantern and on the new software method. On comparison between the Standard Martin Lantern and the Software, the results were consistent and comparable with 82 patients testing CP I on the Martin Lantern and 81 on the software. Of the CP III patients, 253 tested positive on the Standard lantern test as compared to 251 on the software and of the CP IV group, 147 tested positive on the Standard lantern and 149 by the software method. CONCLUSION: It was found that the software replicated the existing Martin Lantern accurately and consistently. The Martin Lantern Software can be used as a replacement for existing old Lanterns which are not in production since the early 20th century.
BACKGROUND: Development and standardization of computerized color vision testing as a replacement for Martin Lantern test. Non-randomized comparative trial. METHODS: All candidates of SSB, Allahabad, reporting for SMB underwent color vision testing at the eye dept by computerized eye test and currently available tests. RESULTS: All candidates were subjected to Ishihara chart testing and those found to be CP III were subjected to the confirmatory test on Martin Lantern and the Software. Candidates requiring CP I standards for eligibility were tested on the same on Martin Lantern and on the new software method. On comparison between the Standard Martin Lantern and the Software, the results were consistent and comparable with 82 patients testing CP I on the Martin Lantern and 81 on the software. Of the CP III patients, 253 tested positive on the Standard lantern test as compared to 251 on the software and of the CP IV group, 147 tested positive on the Standard lantern and 149 by the software method. CONCLUSION: It was found that the software replicated the existing Martin Lantern accurately and consistently. The Martin Lantern Software can be used as a replacement for existing old Lanterns which are not in production since the early 20th century.
Entities:
Keywords:
Color Vision; Ishihara; Lantern Tests; Martin Lantern