Literature DB >> 24532735

Regulation of medicines and medical devices: contrasts and similarities.

Nassim Parvizi1, Kent Woods.   

Abstract

In recent times, there has been an unprecedented level of public interest and active debate regarding the regulation of medical devices. This is in light of the topical, rather dissimilar, incidents involving poly-implant-prothèse (PIP) breast and metal-on-metal hip implants. Although medicines and devices are regulated under European Union (EU) law, the regulatory regimes are very different and some have argued that features of the pharmaceutical regime should be applied to medical devices in the current review of the medical devices directives. Both medicines and certain devices need to have an assessment of their risks and benefits before being used in patients, and undergo subsequent monitoring for adverse events. However, there are significant differences between these two groups in terms of the number of products, the pattern of innovation and development, and the types of adverse events that arise from their use. This review will summarise the key issues through a comparison of how both are regulated and monitored.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Regulation; adverse event; medical devices; medicines

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24532735      PMCID: PMC5873624          DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.14-1-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)        ISSN: 1470-2118            Impact factor:   2.659


  11 in total

1.  Nanomedicines in the EU-Regulatory Overview.

Authors:  Ruben Pita; Falk Ehmann; Marisa Papaluca
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Barriers to the success of an electronic pharmacovigilance reporting system in Kenya: an evaluation three years post implementation.

Authors:  Oscar O Agoro; Sarah W Kibira; Jenny V Freeman; Hamish S F Fraser
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  The clinical implications of poly implant prothèse breast implants: an overview.

Authors:  Umar Wazir; Abdul Kasem; Kefah Mokbel
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2015-01-14

Review 4.  Augmenting endogenous repair of soft tissues with nanofibre scaffolds.

Authors:  Mathew Baldwin; Sarah Snelling; Stephanie Dakin; Andrew Carr
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  New Health Technologies: A UK Perspective Comment on "Providing Value to New Health Technology: The Early Contribution of Entrepreneurs, Investors, and Regulatory Agencies".

Authors:  Nassim Parvizi; Sahar Parvizi
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2017-12-01

6.  Investigating the biological response of human mesenchymal stem cells to titanium surfaces.

Authors:  Matthew J German; Charles Osei-Bempong; Callie A Knuth; David J Deehan; Rachel A Oldershaw
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE PRODUCTION FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT.

Authors:  Karen Facey; Chris Henshall; Laura Sampietro-Colom; Sarah Thomas
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 8.  Recent Applications of Three Dimensional Printing in Cardiovascular Medicine.

Authors:  Chiara Gardin; Letizia Ferroni; Christian Latremouille; Juan Carlos Chachques; Dinko Mitrečić; Barbara Zavan
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 6.600

9.  Drugs and Devices: Comparison of European and U.S. Approval Processes.

Authors:  Gail A Van Norman
Journal:  JACC Basic Transl Sci       Date:  2016-08-29

Review 10.  Point of Care Diagnostics in Resource-Limited Settings: A Review of the Present and Future of PoC in Its Most Needed Environment.

Authors:  Benjamin Heidt; Williane F Siqueira; Kasper Eersels; Hanne Diliën; Bart van Grinsven; Ricardo T Fujiwara; Thomas J Cleij
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.