Literature DB >> 24531987

That's what friends are for: adolescent peer social status, health-related quality of life and healthcare costs.

Marlon P Mundt1, Larissa I Zakletskaia.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Social connections at all stages of life are essential for physical and mental well-being. Of particular importance are social relationships during adolescence that shape adult health behaviors and health outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to estimate the association between adolescent peer status in school and later-life quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and healthcare costs.
METHODS: This study used social network and health outcomes data from Wave I (ages 12-18 years) and Wave III (ages 18-24 years) of the US National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (n = 10,578) to compare QALYs and healthcare costs (in 2012 US$) by adolescent peer status in US schools. Generalized linear models controlled for school fixed effects, individual and family characteristics, and US census block neighborhood effects. Non-parametric bootstrapping accounted for residual skewness in QALYs and healthcare costs. Net monetary benefit (NMB) was calculated by converting adjusted 5-year QALYs into US$ values and subtracting 5-year healthcare costs. NMB was then compared across quintiles of adolescent peer status in school at Wave I.
RESULTS: Results obtained from non-parametric bootstrapping indicate that adolescents with higher peer status in school experience significantly better health and lower healthcare costs over the next 5 years. At US$50,000 per QALY, adolescents with 8 or more friends achieved NMB of US$214,300 (95 % CI 212,800-215,800) over a 5-year span, in comparison to adolescents with 0-1 friends, who attained US$209,900 (95 % CI 207,900-211,700) NMB. This difference translates into approximately US$4,440 (95 % CI 2,036-6,825) per socially disengaged adolescent in additional health costs and/or reduced QALYs over 5 years.
CONCLUSION: The study calls for randomized controlled trials targeting adolescent peer group structures in schools as a means to promote better health and lower healthcare costs in adulthood.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24531987      PMCID: PMC3972808          DOI: 10.1007/s40258-014-0084-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy        ISSN: 1175-5652            Impact factor:   2.561


  42 in total

1.  Estimating the Technology of Cognitive and Noncognitive Skill Formation.

Authors:  Flavio Cunha; James Heckman; Susanne Schennach
Journal:  Econometrica       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 5.844

2.  US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model.

Authors:  James W Shaw; Jeffrey A Johnson; Stephen Joel Coons
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Preference-Based EQ-5D index scores for chronic conditions in the United States.

Authors:  Patrick W Sullivan; Vahram Ghushchyan
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Cost-effectiveness analysis and innovation.

Authors:  Anupam B Jena; Tomas J Philipson
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 5.  Impact of social environment characteristics on neuroendocrine regulation.

Authors:  T E Seeman; B S McEwen
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.312

6.  Children in classrooms: peer status, status distribution and mental well-being.

Authors:  Viveca Ostberg
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Psychosocial morbidity: the economic burden in a pediatric health maintenance organization sample.

Authors:  P Bernal; D B Estroff; J F Aboudarham; M Murphy; A Keller; M S Jellinek
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2000-03

Review 8.  Social relationships and health: a flashpoint for health policy.

Authors:  Debra Umberson; Jennifer Karas Montez
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2010

9.  Social capital does matter for adolescent health: evidence from the English HBSC study.

Authors:  Antony Morgan; Bo J A Haglund
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 2.483

10.  Kindness counts: prompting prosocial behavior in preadolescents boosts peer acceptance and well-being.

Authors:  Kristin Layous; S Katherine Nelson; Eva Oberle; Kimberly A Schonert-Reichl; Sonja Lyubomirsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Paternal Incarceration and Adolescent Social Network Disadvantage.

Authors:  Brielle Bryan
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2017-08

2.  Friendship Quality in Youth With and Without Disruptive Behavior Disorders: The Role of Empathy, Aggression, and Callousness.

Authors:  Katharina Ackermann; Anne Martinelli; Anka Bernhard; Christine M Freitag; Gerhard Büttner; Christina Schwenck
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2019-10

3.  Psychopathology and friendship in children and adolescents: disentangling the role of co-occurring symptom domains with serial mediation models.

Authors:  Arthur Gus Manfro; Pedro M Pan; Ary Gadelha; Marcelo Fleck; Maria C do Rosário; Hugo Cogo-Moreira; Rodrigo Affonseca-Bressan; Jair Mari; Euripedes C Miguel; Luis A Rohde; Giovanni A Salum
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 4.785

4.  Benefits of Bullying? A Test of the Evolutionary Hypothesis in Three Cohorts.

Authors:  Tina Kretschmer; Chaïm la Roi; Rozemarijn van der Ploeg; René Veenstra
Journal:  J Res Adolesc       Date:  2021-08-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.