Eiji Kunita1, Hideya Yamamoto2, Toshiro Kitagawa1, Norihiko Ohashi1, Toshiharu Oka1, Hiroto Utsunomiya1, Yoji Urabe1, Hiroshi Tsushima1, Kazuo Awai3, Matthew J Budoff4, Yasuki Kihara1. 1. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan. 2. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan. Electronic address: hideyayama@hiroshima-u.ac.jp. 3. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan. 4. Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) accumulation is believed to be associated with development of coronary atherosclerosis. We investigated whether EAT volume as assessed by computed tomography (CT) has value in prediction of future cardiac events. METHODS: We studied 722 patients without proven coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent non-contrast cardiac CT. EAT volume and coronary artery calcium (CAC) score were measured simultaneously. Patients were followed as to the occurrence of coronary events (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring hospitalization, and late coronary revascularization≥3 months after CT examination). RESULTS: During a 3.7±1.7 years follow-up period, 37 coronary events were documented. Annual event rates increased across CAC score categories (0.3%, 1.0%, 2.4%, and 4.3%, in 0, 1-99, 100-399, and ≥400, respectively, p<0.001); these were significantly higher in the higher EAT volume group (>median; 107.2 mL, 0.7% vs., 2.1%, adjusted hazard ratio; 2.65, p=0.0090). Cox-proportional hazard analysis demonstrated that a combination of CAC score≥100 and high EAT volume had a significantly higher event rate than CAC score<100 and low EAT volume group (adjusted hazard ratio 11.6, p<0.0001). Using Cox regression models, incremental prognostic values were identified by adding high EAT volume to clinical risks plus CAC score≥100 (global χ2, 6.7; p=0.059). CONCLUSION: We suggest that high EAT volume may be an independent predictor of future coronary events and increases predictive values of CAC score in patients without proven CAD.
OBJECTIVE: Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) accumulation is believed to be associated with development of coronary atherosclerosis. We investigated whether EAT volume as assessed by computed tomography (CT) has value in prediction of future cardiac events. METHODS: We studied 722 patients without proven coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent non-contrast cardiac CT. EAT volume and coronary artery calcium (CAC) score were measured simultaneously. Patients were followed as to the occurrence of coronary events (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring hospitalization, and late coronary revascularization≥3 months after CT examination). RESULTS: During a 3.7±1.7 years follow-up period, 37 coronary events were documented. Annual event rates increased across CAC score categories (0.3%, 1.0%, 2.4%, and 4.3%, in 0, 1-99, 100-399, and ≥400, respectively, p<0.001); these were significantly higher in the higher EAT volume group (>median; 107.2 mL, 0.7% vs., 2.1%, adjusted hazard ratio; 2.65, p=0.0090). Cox-proportional hazard analysis demonstrated that a combination of CAC score≥100 and high EAT volume had a significantly higher event rate than CAC score<100 and low EAT volume group (adjusted hazard ratio 11.6, p<0.0001). Using Cox regression models, incremental prognostic values were identified by adding high EAT volume to clinical risks plus CAC score≥100 (global χ2, 6.7; p=0.059). CONCLUSION: We suggest that high EAT volume may be an independent predictor of future coronary events and increases predictive values of CAC score in patients without proven CAD.
Authors: James V Spearman; Matthias Renker; U Joseph Schoepf; Aleksander W Krazinski; Teri L Herbert; Carlo N De Cecco; Paul J Nietert; Felix G Meinel Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-04-30 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Meredith Kohr Owen; Jillian N Noblet; Daniel J Sassoon; Abass M Conteh; Adam G Goodwill; Johnathan D Tune Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2014-05-01 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Xoana Barros; Timm Dirrichs; Ralf Koos; Sebastian Reinartz; Nadine Kaesler; Rafael Kramann; Ulrich Gladziwa; Markus Ketteler; Jürgen Floege; Nikolaus Marx; José V Torregrosa; András Keszei; Vincent M Brandenburg Journal: J Nephrol Date: 2015-08-08 Impact factor: 3.902
Authors: Michael T Lu; Jakob Park; Khristine Ghemigian; Thomas Mayrhofer; Stefan B Puchner; Ting Liu; Jerome L Fleg; James E Udelson; Quynh A Truong; Maros Ferencik; Udo Hoffmann Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2016-05-20 Impact factor: 5.162