Literature DB >> 24530545

Conventional mesophilic vs. thermophilic anaerobic digestion: a trade-off between performance and stability?

Rodrigo A Labatut1, Largus T Angenent2, Norman R Scott2.   

Abstract

A long-term comparative study using continuously-stirred anaerobic digesters (CSADs) operated at mesophilic and thermophilic temperatures was conducted to evaluate the influence of the organic loading rate (OLR) and chemical composition on process performance and stability. Cow manure was co-digested with dog food, a model substrate to simulate a generic, multi-component food-like waste and to produce non-substrate specific, composition-based results. Cow manure and dog food were mixed at a lower - and an upper co-digestion ratio to produce a low-fiber, high-strength substrate, and a more recalcitrant, lower-strength substrate, respectively. Three increasing OLRs were evaluated by decreasing the CSADs hydraulic retention time (HRT) from 20 to 10 days. At longer HRTs and lower manure-to-dog food ratio, the thermophilic CSAD was not stable and eventually failed as a result of long-chain fatty acid (LCFA) accumulation/degradation, which was triggered by the compounded effects of temperature on reaction rates, mixing intensity, and physical state of LCFAs. At shorter HRTs and upper manure-to-dog food ratio, the thermophilic CSAD marginally outperformed the biomethane production rates and substrate stabilization of the mesophilic CSAD. The increased fiber content relative to lipids at upper manure-to-dog food ratios improved the stability and performance of the thermophilic process by decreasing the concentration of LCFAs in solution, likely adsorbed onto the manure fibers. Overall, results of this study show that stability of the thermophilic co-digestion process is highly dependent on the influent substrate composition, and particularly for this study, on the proportion of manure to lipids in the influent stream. In contrast, mesophilic co-digestion provided a more robust and stable process regardless of the influent composition, only with marginally lower biomethane production rates (i.e., 7%) for HRTs as short as 10 days (OLR = 3 g VS/L-d).
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adsorption; Co-digestion; LCFA; Loading rate; Manure; Mixing intensity; Temperature

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24530545     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.01.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  17 in total

1.  Identification of syntrophic acetate-oxidizing bacteria in anaerobic digesters by combined protein-based stable isotope probing and metagenomics.

Authors:  Freya Mosbæk; Henrik Kjeldal; Daniel G Mulat; Mads Albertsen; Alastair J Ward; Anders Feilberg; Jeppe L Nielsen
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Mesophilic versus thermophilic anaerobic digestion of cattle manure: methane productivity and microbial ecology.

Authors:  Veronica Moset; Morten Poulsen; Radziah Wahid; Ole Højberg; Henrik Bjarne Møller
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 5.813

3.  Temperature and solids retention time control microbial population dynamics and volatile fatty acid production in replicated anaerobic digesters.

Authors:  Inka Vanwonterghem; Paul D Jensen; Korneel Rabaey; Gene W Tyson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Dynamic functional characterization and phylogenetic changes due to Long Chain Fatty Acids pulses in biogas reactors.

Authors:  Panagiotis G Kougias; Laura Treu; Stefano Campanaro; Xinyu Zhu; Irini Angelidaki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Small temperature differences can improve the performance of mesophilic sludge-based digesters.

Authors:  Maja Nielsen; Christian Holst-Fischer; Bjørn Malmgren-Hansen; Michael Bjerg-Nielsen; Caroline Kragelund; Henrik Bjarne Møller; Lars Ditlev Mørck Ottosen
Journal:  Biotechnol Lett       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 2.461

6.  Global Cryptosporidium Loads from Livestock Manure.

Authors:  Lucie C Vermeulen; Jorien Benders; Gertjan Medema; Nynke Hofstra
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Microbial population dynamics during long-term sludge adaptation of thermophilic and mesophilic sequencing batch digesters treating sewage fine sieved fraction at varying organic loading rates.

Authors:  Dara S M Ghasimi; Yu Tao; Merle de Kreuk; Marcel H Zandvoort; Jules B van Lier
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 6.040

8.  Microorganism-regulated mechanisms of temperature effects on the performance of anaerobic digestion.

Authors:  Qiang Lin; Guihua He; Junpeng Rui; Xiaoyu Fang; Yong Tao; Jiabao Li; Xiangzhen Li
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 5.328

9.  Biomethane potential of industrial paper wastes and investigation of the methanogenic communities involved.

Authors:  Andreas Walter; Sandra Silberberger; Marina Fernández-Delgado Juárez; Heribert Insam; Ingrid H Franke-Whittle
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 6.040

10.  Biogas production from food waste via co-digestion and digestion- effects on performance and microbial ecology.

Authors:  Mirzaman Zamanzadeh; Live Heldal Hagen; Kine Svensson; Roar Linjordet; Svein Jarle Horn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.