Literature DB >> 24530167

Three-year results comparing platinum-chromium PROMUS element and cobalt-chromium XIENCE V everolimus-eluting stents in de novo coronary artery narrowing (from the PLATINUM Trial).

Ian T Meredith1, Paul S Teirstein2, Alain Bouchard3, Didier Carrié4, Helge Möllmann5, Keith G Oldroyd6, Jack Hall7, Dominic J Allocco8, Keith D Dawkins8, Gregg W Stone9.   

Abstract

In the randomized PLATINUM trial, the PROMUS Element platinum-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (PtCr-EES; Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) was noninferior to the XIENCE V cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-EES; Boston Scientific and Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) for the primary end point of 1-year target lesion failure. This study reports the 3-year outcomes. Patients (n=1,530) with 1 or 2 de novo native coronary artery lesions (baseline vessel diameter≥2.50 mm to ≤4.25 mm and length≤24 mm) were randomized 1:1 to PtCr-EES versus CoCr-EES. Three-year follow-up was available in 93.9% (703 of 749) of patients with CoCr-EES and 96.7% (733 of 758) of patients with PtCr-EES. Comparing CoCr-EES with PtCr-EES, 3-year rates of death (4.3% vs 3.7%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52 to 1.48, p=0.62), cardiac death (1.9% vs 1.2%, HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.45, p=0.27), myocardial infarction (2.5% vs 2.3%, HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.79, p=0.81), ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (4.9% vs 3.5%, HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.20, p=0.21), and Academic Research Consortium definite or probable stent thrombosis (0.5% vs 0.7%, HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.33 to 4.57, p=0.76) were not significantly different. In conclusion, 3-year results of the PLATINUM randomized, controlled, clinical trial demonstrate comparable safety and efficacy outcomes of the PROMUS Element PtCr-EES and the XIENCE V CoCr-EES.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24530167     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  7 in total

Review 1.  Drug eluting stents: To evolve or dissolve?

Authors:  Prashant Bharadwaj; D S Chadha
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2016-11-04

Review 2.  New concepts in the design of drug-eluting coronary stents.

Authors:  Scot Garg; Christos Bourantas; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 3.  New-Generation Coronary Stents: Current Data and Future Directions.

Authors:  Ankur Kalra; Hasan Rehman; Sahil Khera; Braghadheeswar Thyagarajan; Deepak L Bhatt; Neal S Kleiman; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.113

4.  One-year clinical outcomes of different coronary drug eluting stents-Data from a prospective registry.

Authors:  B K S Sastry; Krishna Reddy Nallamalla; Nirmal Kumar; Deepti Kodati; Rajeev Menon
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2018-05-17

5.  Stent thrombosis rates the first year and beyond with new- and old-generation drug-eluting stents compared to bare metal stents.

Authors:  Christoph Varenhorst; Martin Lindholm; Giovanna Sarno; Göran Olivecrona; Ulf Jensen; Johan Nilsson; Jörg Carlsson; Stefan James; Bo Lagerqvist
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 5.460

6.  A novel platinum chromium everolimus-eluting stent for the treatment of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Johan Bennett; Christophe Dubois
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2013-06-19

Review 7.  Coronary stent fracture: a recently appreciated phenomenon with clinical relevance.

Authors:  Madjid Chinikar; Parham Sadeghipour
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2014-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.