Literature DB >> 24530121

Facilitators and barriers to external cephalic version for breech presentation at term among health care providers in the Netherlands: a quantitative analysis.

Ageeth N Rosman1, Floortje Vlemmix2, Antje Beuckens3, Marlies E Rijnders4, Brent C Opmeer5, Ben Willem J Mol6, Marjolein Kok2, Margot A H Fleuren7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: guidelines recommend that external cephalic version (ECV) should be offered to all women with a fetus in breech presentation at term. However, only 50-60% of the women receive an ECV attempt. We explored the determinants (barriers and facilitators) affecting the uptake of the guidelines among gynaecologists and midwives in the Netherlands.
DESIGN: national online survey.
SETTING: the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: gynaecologists and midwives. MEASUREMENTS: in the online survey, we identified the determinants that positively or negatively influenced the professionals׳ adherence to three key recommendations in the guidelines: (a) counselling, (b) advising for ECV, (c) arranging an ECV. Determinants were identified in a previously performed qualitative study and were categorised into five underlying constructs; attitude towards ECV, professional obligation, outcome expectations, self-efficacy and preconditions for successful ECV. We performed a multivariate analysis to assess the importance of the different constructs for adherence to the guideline.
FINDINGS: 364 professionals responded to the survey. Adherence varied: 84% counselled, 73% advised, and 82% arranged an ECV for (almost) all their clients. Although 90% of respondents considered ECV to be an effective treatment for preventing caesarean childbirths, only 30% agreed that 'every client should undergo ECV'. Self-efficacy (perceived skills) was the most important determinant influencing adherence. KEY
CONCLUSIONS: self-efficacy appears to be the most significant determinant for counselling, advising and arranging an ECV. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: to improve adherence to the guidelines on ECV we must improve self-efficacy.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Determinants; External cephalic version; Guidelines; Implementation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24530121     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2014.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  3 in total

1.  Management of breech presentation at term: a retrospective cohort study of 10 years of experience.

Authors:  J Burgos; L Rodríguez; P Cobos; C Osuna; M Del Mar Centeno; R Larrieta; T Martínez-Astorquiza; L Fernández-Llebrez
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Maternal outcomes of term breech presentation delivery: impact of successful external cephalic version in a nationwide sample of delivery admissions in the United States.

Authors:  Carolyn F Weiniger; Deirdre J Lyell; Lawrence C Tsen; Alexander J Butwick; BatZion Shachar; William M Callaghan; Andreea A Creanga; Brian T Bateman
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  A stitch in time saves nine? A repeated cross-sectional case study on the implementation of the intersectoral community approach Youth At a Healthy Weight.

Authors:  Rianne M J J van der Kleij; Mathilde R Crone; Theo G W M Paulussen; Vivan M van de Gaar; Ria Reis
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.295

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.