Literature DB >> 24530043

Evaluation of the Sendai and 2012 International Consensus Guidelines based on cross-sectional imaging findings performed for the initial triage of mucinous cystic lesions of the pancreas: a single institution experience with 114 surgically treated patients.

Brian K P Goh1, Choon-Hua Thng2, Damien M Y Tan3, Albert S C Low4, Jen-San Wong5, Peng-Chung Cheow5, Pierce K H Chow6, Alexander Y F Chung5, Wai-Keong Wong7, London L P J Ooi6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Sendai Consensus Guidelines (SCG) were formulated in 2006 to guide the management of mucinous cystic lesions of the pancreas (CLPs) and were updated in 2012 (International Consensus Guidelines, ICG 2012). This study aims to evaluate the clinical utility of the ICG 2012 with the SCG based on initial cross-sectional imaging findings.
METHODS: One hundred fourteen patients with mucinous CLPs were reviewed and classified according to the ICG 2012 as high risk (HR(ICG2012)), worrisome (W(ICG2012)), and low risk (LR(ICG2012)), and according to the SCG as high risk (HR(SCG)) and low risk (LR(SCG)).
RESULTS: On univariate analysis, the presence of symptoms, obstructive jaundice, elevated serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)/carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9, solid component, main pancreatic duct ≥ 10 mm, and main pancreatic duct ≥ 5 mm was associated with high grade dysplasia/invasive carcinoma in all mucinous CLPs. Increasing number of HR(SCG) or HR(ICG2012) features was associated with a significantly increased likelihood of malignancy. The positive predictive value of HR(SCG) and HR(ICG2012) for high grade dysplasia/invasive carcinoma was 46% and 62.5% respectively. The negative predictive value of both LR(SCG) and LR(ICG2012) was 100%.
CONCLUSION: Both the guidelines were useful in the initial cross-sectional imaging evaluation of mucinous CLPs. The ICG 2012 guidelines were superior to the SCG guidelines.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cystic lesion of the pancreas; Guidelines; Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm; Pancreatic cyst; Pancreatic cystic neoplasm

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24530043     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.09.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  27 in total

1.  Comparison between MRI with MR cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasonography for differentiating malignant from benign mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas.

Authors:  Jiyoung Hwang; Young Kon Kim; Ji Hye Min; Woo Kyung Jeong; Seong Sook Hong; Hyun-Joo Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Clinical approach to incidental pancreatic cysts.

Authors:  Austin L Chiang; Linda S Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Plectin-1 as a Biomarker of Malignant Progression in Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Maria Moris; David W Dawson; Jennifer Jiang; Jason Lewis; Aziza Nassar; Kenneth K Takeuchi; Anna R Lay; Qihui Zhai; Timothy R Donahue; Kimberly A Kelly; Howard C Crawford; Michael Wallace
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 4.  Diagnosis and management of pancreatic cystic neoplasms.

Authors:  Mathew James Keegan; Bharat Paranandi
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-03-01

5.  Fukuoka and AGA Criteria Have Superior Diagnostic Accuracy for Advanced Cystic Neoplasms than Sendai Criteria.

Authors:  Michael Sighinolfi; Susan Y Quan; Yvonne Lee; Alvaro Ibaseta; Kimberly Pham; Monica M Dua; George A Poultsides; Brendan C Visser; Jeffery A Norton; Walter G Park
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Evaluation of the International Consensus Guidelines for the Surgical Resection of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms.

Authors:  Mariko Tsukagoshi; Kenichiro Araki; Fumiyoshi Saito; Norio Kubo; Akira Watanabe; Takamichi Igarashi; Norihiro Ishii; Takahiro Yamanaka; Ken Shirabe; Hiroyuki Kuwano
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Outcome of long interval radiological surveillance of side branch pancreatic duct-involved intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm in selected patients.

Authors:  Yazan S Khaled; Muhammed Mohsin; Kavi Fatania; Ada Yee; Robert Adair; Maria Sheridan; Christian Macutkiewicz; Amer Aldouri; Andrew M Smith
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  New guidelines for use of endoscopic ultrasound for evaluation and risk stratification of pancreatic cystic lesions may be too conservative.

Authors:  Nadav Sahar; Anthony Razzak; Zaheer S Kanji; David L Coy; Richard Kozarek; Andrew S Ross; Michael Gluck; Michael Larsen; Shayan Irani; S Ian Gan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Surveillance of Cystic Lesions of the Pancreas: Whom and How to Survey?

Authors:  Stefano Andrianello; Massimo Falconi; Roberto Salvia; Stefano Crippa; Giovanni Marchegiani
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2018-06-13

10.  Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: radiological predictors of malignant transformation and the introduction of bile duct dilation to current guidelines.

Authors:  Albert Strauss; Matthew Birdsey; Stefan Fritz; Bogata D Schwarz-Bundy; Frank Bergmann; Thilo Hackert; Hans-Ullrich Kauczor; Lars Grenacher; Miriam Klauss
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.