Literature DB >> 24529831

Factors affecting cosmesis after breast conserving surgery without oncoplastic techniques in an experienced comprehensive breast center.

Tolga Ozmen1, Ahmet Veysel Polat2, Ayfer Kamali Polat2, Marguerite Bonaventura2, Ronald Johnson2, Atilla Soran2.   

Abstract

We aimed to study the factors affecting cosmetic outcome (CO) in breast conserving surgery (BCS) without oncoplastic techniques in our center with a BCS rate higher than 60% in more than 1000 breast cancer surgeries a year. In this study 284 patients who underwent BCS without oncoplastic techniques were included. Surgeries were performed by two experienced breast surgeons with more than 25 years of experience. These patients were followed in our established Wellness Clinic postoperatively. The CO is evaluated according to the "Harvard Breast Cosmesis Grading Scale" by a breast surgeon who did not participate in the patient's surgery. The correlation among patient factors (age, breast volume, menopausal status), tumor factors (size, location, distance to areola) and treatment factors (excision volume, breast skin excision, axillary surgery, adjuvant therapy) and CO were evaluated. The mean age was 57.6 [33-98] years in the successful CO group and 58.1 [34-85] years in the unsuccessful CO group (p > 0.05). The mean follow-up time was 37.9 [24-84] months. The CO was successful in 88.7% (n:252) of the patients. Tumor size, retroareolar location of the tumor, adjuvant chemotherapy administration and whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT) were correlated with a poorer CO (p < 0.05). We were able to attain a successful CO in approximately 90% of our patients. Adding oncoplastic techniques to the surgical management of larger tumors and retroareolar tumors, may increase the percentage of good CO. In selected patients choosing balloon brachytherapy instead of WBRT, may also have positive effects on CO.
Copyright © 2014 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Breast conserving surgery; Cosmetic outcome; Oncoplastic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24529831     DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2013.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgeon        ISSN: 1479-666X            Impact factor:   2.392


  10 in total

1.  Validation of the electronic version of the BREAST-Q in the army of women study.

Authors:  Sarah Fuzesi; Stefan J Cano; Anne F Klassen; Dunya Atisha; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 4.380

2.  Rhomboid Flap Technique in Breast-conserving Surgery: An Alternative Method for the Reconstruction of Lumpectomy Defects.

Authors:  Ebru Menekşe; Sefa Özyazıcı; Faruk Karateke; Ümit Turan; Adnan Kuvvetli; Cihan Gökler; Mehmet Özdoğan; Safa Önel
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2015-10-01

3.  Oncoplastic Breast Reconstruction in Breast Conservation Surgery: Improving the Oncological and Aesthetic Outcomes.

Authors:  Santosh N Mathapati; Ashish Goel; Sandeep Mehta; Juhi Aggarwal; R Aravindan; Vikash Nayak; Sangram K Panda; Pankaj K Pande; Kapil Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-03-14

4.  Systematization of Oncoplastic Surgery: Selection of Surgical Techniques and Patient-Reported Outcome in a Cohort of 1,035 Patients.

Authors:  Mahdi Rezai; Sarah Knispel; Stephanie Kellersmann; Hildegard Lax; Rainer Kimmig; Peter Kern
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Aesthetic evaluation in oncoplastic and conservative breast surgery: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Michela Massa; Paolo Meszaros; Ilaria Baldelli; Nadia Bisso; Simonetta Franchelli
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-04-07

6.  Determinants for patient satisfaction regarding aesthetic outcome and skin sensitivity after breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Cecilia Dahlbäck; Jonas Manjer; Martin Rehn; Anita Ringberg
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 2.754

7.  A prospective comparison of subjective and objective assessments of cosmetic outcomes following breast brachytherapy.

Authors:  Tabassum Wadasadawala; Shwetabh Sinha; Shalini Verma; Vani Parmar; Sadhana Kannan; Rima Pathak; Rajiv Sarin; Mithila Gaikar
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2019-06-28

8.  Awareness and Acceptability of Breast Reconstruction Among Women With Breast Cancer: A Prospective Survey.

Authors:  Nita S Nair; Prasanth Penumadu; Prabha Yadav; Nitin Sethi; Pavneet S Kohli; Vinaykant Shankhdhar; Dushyant Jaiswal; Vani Parmar; Rohini W Hawaldar; Rajendra A Badwe
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2021-02

9.  Breast cancer patient-reported outcome of factors influencing cosmetic satisfaction after breast-conserving therapy.

Authors:  A T P M Brands-Appeldoorn; A J G Maaskant-Braat; L Janssen; L A D M van Osch; V C G Tjan-Heijnen; R M H Roumen
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 4.239

10.  'At least there is something in my bra': A qualitative study of women's experiences with oncoplastic breast surgery.

Authors:  Stine Thestrup Hansen; Lene Anette Willemoes Rasmussen
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.057

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.