Literature DB >> 24529812

Can laparoscopic cholecystectomy be performed with a positive margin at medicaid reimbursement rates?

Richard C Frazee1, Victoria G Elliott2, Wilma Larsen2, Seth Lerner2, Keith W Minnis2, Court Huber2, James Nolan2, Harry Papaconstantinou2, W Roy Smythe2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Affordable Care Act provides health care coverage to an increasing segment of the population at Medicaid reimbursement rates. Health care systems currently offset lower Medicaid reimbursement through higher payers. The ability to "cost shift" will be diminished as the Medicaid population increases. STUDY
DESIGN: A financial cost and revenue analysis of outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy at our institution was performed. Cost was defined as actual expense to the health care institution. Fixed and variable costs were identified to calculate a break-even point. Time spent from check in to dismissal was based on historic averages. When actual costs could not be pinpointed, estimates from industry experts were used. Reimbursement included surgeon and anesthesia professional fees and facility fees.
RESULTS: A total of 501 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed at the main operating room facility in 2012. Annual fixed costs were $252,637. Variable costs were $1,860/case. Personnel and single-use equipment made the largest contribution to variable costs. Reimbursement for professional and facility fees totaled $2,444/case. The break-even point occurred at 454 cases. Based on historic volume, the break-even point for the calendar year would occur on November 27.
CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis demonstrates that laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be performed with a positive margin at Medicaid reimbursement rates with sufficient volume. The minimal margin, however, could substantially limit the ability of lower-volume hospitals to provide these services and negatively impact access to care in this patient population.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24529812     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.12.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  6 in total

1.  Examining variation in cost based on surgeon choices for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Heather H Adkins; Thomas J Hardacker; Eugene P Ceppa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Financial modeling of current surgical robotic system in outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: how should we think about the expense?

Authors:  S D Schwaitzberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Robotic single-site versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Which is cheaper? A cost report and analysis.

Authors:  Kareem Bedeir; Andrew Mann; Yassar Youssef
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Access to common laparoscopic general surgical procedures: do racial disparities exist?

Authors:  Kasey Leigh Wood; Syed F Haider; Anthony Bui; I Michael Leitman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Patient comorbidities increase postoperative resource utilization after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Jacqueline Boehme; Sophia McKinley; L Michael Brunt; Tina D Hunter; Daniel B Jones; Daniel J Scott; Steven D Schwaitzberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Single-Site Robotic Cholecystectomy at an Inner-City Academic Center.

Authors:  Paul J Chung; Raymond Huang; Lucas Policastro; Roseanna Lee; Alexander Schwartzman; Antonio Alfonso; Gainosuke Sugiyama
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.