Literature DB >> 24529762

The impact of dosimetric inadequacy on treatment outcome of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with IMRT.

Wai Tong Ng1, Michael C H Lee2, Amy T Y Chang3, Oscar S H Chan3, Lucy L K Chan3, Foon Yiu Cheung3, Wai Man Hung3, Connie C C Chan3, Anne W M Lee4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: This study aims to address the relationship between tumor size and dosimetric inadequacy in treating nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and how it subsequently affects the local control.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 444 NPC patients treated with IMRT from 2005 to 2010 were included in the study. The planning aim was to deliver at least 66.5 Gy (i.e. 95% of 70 Gy) to 95% of the primary gross tumor volume (GTV_P) while keeping all the critical neurological organs at risk (OAR) within dose tolerance. Treatment outcome were analyzed according to T stage, GTV_P volume and the degree of under-dosing.
RESULTS: Disease outcome was related to T stage, GTV_P volume and the degree of under-dosing. The 5-year local failure free survival (LFFS), disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for T4 disease were 74%, 50.4% and 63.6% respectively. 48 cm(3) was identified as the critical cut-off GTV_P volume, the large volume group (GTV_P ≥ 48 cm(3)) had lower 5-year DFS (50.4% vs. 76.6%) and OS (65.2% vs. 86.3%, p < 0.001). Most T4 diseases (and some T3) were under-dosed (<66.5 Gy) and an under-dosed GTV_P volume of 3.4 cm(3) was found to be prognostically important. Multivariate analyses showed that the effect of GTV_P volume on LFFR and DFS was outweighed by the degree of under-dosing.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment outcome of locally advanced NPC was significantly affected by the volume of under-dosed (<66.5 Gy) GTV_P due to the neighboring neurological structures. A new set of OAR dose constraint and specification is proposed.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dose specification; Dosimetry; IMRT; Nasopharyngeal carcinoma; Organ at risk

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24529762     DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Oncol        ISSN: 1368-8375            Impact factor:   5.337


  24 in total

Review 1.  Does East meet West? Towards a unified vision of the management of Nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Elaine Johanna Limkin; Pierre Blanchard
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Plasma Epstein-Barr viral DNA complements TNM classification of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Lu Zhang; Lin-Quan Tang; Qiu-Yan Chen; Huai Liu; Shan-Shan Guo; Li-Ting Liu; Ling Guo; Hao-Yuan Mo; Chong Zhao; Xiang Guo; Ka-Jia Cao; Chao-Nan Qian; Mu-Sheng Zeng; Jian-Yong Shao; Ying Sun; Jun Ma; Ming-Huang Hong; Hai-Qiang Mai
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-02-02

3.  Induction chemotherapy followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy with reduced gross tumor volume delineation for stage T3-4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Fen Xue; Chaosu Hu; Xiayun He
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Prognostic value of total tumor volume in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Shao-Bo Liang; Jian-Jian Teng; Xue-Feng Hu; Xing-Li Yang; Min Luo; Xiao-Na Fang; Dong-Sheng Liu; Yong Chen; Li-Wu Fu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Cervical nodal volume for prognostication and risk stratification of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and implications on the TNM-staging system.

Authors:  Hui Yuan; Qi-Yong Ai; Dora Lai-Wan Kwong; Daniel Yee-Tak Fong; Ann D King; Varut Vardhanabhuti; Victor Ho-Fun Lee; Pek-Lan Khong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Radiotherapy Controversies and Prospective in Head and Neck Cancer: A Literature-Based Critical Review.

Authors:  Francesca De Felice; Antonella Polimeni; Valentino Valentini; Orlando Brugnoletti; Andrea Cassoni; Antonio Greco; Marco de Vincentiis; Vincenzo Tombolini
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 5.715

7.  Cetuximab and Cisplatin Show Different Combination Effect in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cells Lines via Inactivation of EGFR/AKT Signaling Pathway.

Authors:  Jiajia Gu; Li Yin; Jing Wu; Nan Zhang; Teng Huang; Kai Ding; Haixia Cao; Lin Xu; Xia He
Journal:  Biochem Res Int       Date:  2016-05-24

8.  Prognostic value of the distance between the primary tumor and brainstem in the patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Yuxiang He; Ying Wang; Lin Shen; Yajie Zhao; Pengfei Cao; Mingjun Lei; Dengming Chen; Tubao Yang; Liangfang Shen; Shousong Cao
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Pretreatment Nomograms for Local and Regional Recurrence after Radical Radiation Therapy for Primary Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Fo-Ping Chen; Li Lin; Zhen-Yu Qi; Guan-Qun Zhou; Rui Guo; Jiang Hu; Ai-Hua Lin; Jun Ma; Ying Sun
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.207

10.  Endostar Combined with Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Chemotherapy for Patients with Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: an Update.

Authors:  Ting Jin; Feng Jiang; Qi-Feng Jin; Yong-Feng Piao; Xiao-Zhong Chen
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 4.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.