Literature DB >> 24529729

Fewer complications result from a video-assisted approach to anatomic resection of clinical stage I lung cancer.

Daniel J Boffa1, Anish Dhamija2, Andrzej S Kosinski3, Anthony W Kim2, Frank C Detterbeck2, John D Mitchell4, Mark W Onaitis5, Subroto Paul6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Anatomic resection is currently the standard of care for clinical stage I lung cancer, yet clinicians increasingly pursue nonsurgical, ablative therapies to avoid the morbidity of thoracotomy. The video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) approach is a minimally invasive alternative to thoracotomy yet the effect of VATS on the morbidity of patients undergoing lung cancer resection is not fully characterized. We evaluated complications following anatomic resection of clinical stage I lung cancer by VATS and thoracotomy to clarify the effect of the minimally invasive approach.
METHODS: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons database was queried for lobectomies and segmentectomies performed between 2001 and 2010 for clinical stage I primary cancer.
RESULTS: A total of 11,531 (7137 open and 4394 VATS) patients with clinical stage I primary lung cancers underwent resection. Propensity scoring was used to match cases into 2745 well-balanced pairs. Overall complications were significantly more likely in the thoracotomy group (36%) than in the VATS cohort (30%; P < .001). Patients undergoing thoracotomy experienced significantly more pulmonary complications (21% vs 18%), atrial arrhythmias (13% vs 10%), and were more likely to undergo transfusion (6% vs 4%). Operative mortality was similar (thoracotomy 1.8%, VATS 1.3%; P = .13).
CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic resection of early stage lung cancer is performed with a low mortality rate, according to data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Perioperative complications are significantly less likely to occur when patients with stage I lung cancers undergo resection using the VATS approach. Further study is warranted to determine long-term effects of these differences in perioperative outcomes.
Copyright © 2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24529729     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.12.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  35 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy vs. thoracotomy lobectomy for stage IA non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Risa Oda; Katsuhiro Okuda; Satoshi Osaga; Takuya Watanabe; Tadashi Sakane; Tsutomu Tatematsu; Keisuke Yokota; Hiroshi Haneda; Ryoichi Nakanishi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Evaluation of a novel multi-articulated endoscope: proof of concept through a virtual simulation.

Authors:  Tuukka Karvonen; Yusuke Muranishi; Goshiro Yamamoto; Tomohiro Kuroda; Toshihiko Sato
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Troubleshooting complicated hilar anatomy via prophylactically clamping the pulmonary artery: three videos demonstrating three techniques.

Authors:  Chengwu Liu; Lin Ma; Qiang Pu; Jiandong Mei; Hu Liao; Yunke Zhu; Feng Lin; Lunxu Liu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-09

4.  Comparison of the Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery versus Open Thoracotomy Bronchial Sleeve Lobectomy for Central Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yanbo Yang; Jiandong Mei; Feng Lin; Qiang Pu; Lin Ma; Chengwu Liu; Yunke Zhu; Chenglin Guo; Liang Xia; Lunxu Liu
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Decreasing use of epidural analgesia with increasing minimally invasive lobectomy: Impact on postoperative morbidity.

Authors:  Masha Zeltsman; Jordan Dozier; Raj G Vaghjiani; Alexandra Poch; Takashi Eguchi; Alessia Pedoto; David R Jones; Prasad S Adusumilli
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 5.705

6.  VATS lobectomy vs. open lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer: an endless question-are we close to a definite answer?

Authors:  Francesco Guerrera; Anne Olland; Enrico Ruffini; Pierre-Emmanuel Falcoz
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Searching for an arrow hitting two targets: the time to evaluate long-term outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer.

Authors:  Tomohito Saito; Tomohiro Murakawa
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  VATS lobectomy for early lung cancer: long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Paul A Toste; Jay M Lee
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

9.  Perioperative mortality and morbidity after sublobar versus lobar resection for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: post-hoc analysis of an international, randomised, phase 3 trial (CALGB/Alliance 140503).

Authors:  Nasser K Altorki; Xiaofei Wang; Dennis Wigle; Lin Gu; Gail Darling; Ahmad S Ashrafi; Rodney Landrenau; Daniel Miller; Moishe Liberman; David R Jones; Robert Keenan; Massimo Conti; Gavin Wright; Linda J Veit; Suresh S Ramalingam; Mohamed Kamel; Harvey I Pass; John D Mitchell; Thomas Stinchcombe; Everett Vokes; Leslie J Kohman
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 30.700

Review 10.  Surgical treatment for early stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Vignesh Raman; Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang; John Z Deng; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.