Literature DB >> 24529627

Differential regulation of morphology and stemness of mouse embryonic stem cells by substrate stiffness and topography.

Dongyuan Lü1, Chunhua Luo1, Chen Zhang1, Zhan Li1, Mian Long2.   

Abstract

The maintenance of stem cell pluripotency or stemness is crucial to embryonic development and differentiation. The mechanical or physical microenvironment of stem cells, which includes extracellular matrix stiffness and topography, regulates cell morphology and stemness. Although a growing body of evidence has shown the importance of these factors in stem cell differentiation, the impact of these biophysical or biomechanical regulators remains insufficiently characterized. In the present study, we applied a micro-fabricated polyacrylamide hydrogel substrate with two elasticities and three topographies to systematically test the morphology, proliferation, and stemness of mESCs. The independent or combined impact of the two factors on specific cell functions was analyzed. Cells are able to grow effectively on both polystyrene and polyacrylamide substrates in the absence of feeder cells. Substrate stiffness is predominant in preserving stemness by enhancing Oct-4 and Nanog expression on a soft polyacrylamide substrate. Topography is also a critical factor for manipulating stemness via the formation of a relatively flattened colony on a groove or pillar substrate and a spheroid colony on a hexagonal substrate. Although topography is less effective on soft substrates, it plays a role in retaining cell stemness on stiff, hexagonal or pillar-shaped substrates. mESCs also form, in a timely manner, a 3D structure on groove or hexagonal substrates. These results further the understanding of stem cell morphology and stemness in a microenvironment that mimics physiological conditions.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Morphology; Stem cell; Stemness; Stiffness; Topography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24529627     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.01.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  33 in total

1.  Nanofibers as Bioinstructive Scaffolds Capable of Modulating Differentiation through Mechanosensitive Pathways for Regenerative Engineering.

Authors:  Daniel T Bowers; Justin L Brown
Journal:  Regen Eng Transl Med       Date:  2018-07-31

Review 2.  Structural properties of scaffolds: Crucial parameters towards stem cells differentiation.

Authors:  Laleh Ghasemi-Mobarakeh; Molamma P Prabhakaran; Lingling Tian; Elham Shamirzaei-Jeshvaghani; Leila Dehghani; Seeram Ramakrishna
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 5.326

3.  Effect of microgravity on proliferation and differentiation of embryonic stem cells in an automated culturing system during the TZ-1 space mission.

Authors:  Xiaohua Lei; Yujing Cao; Ying Zhang; Jingjing Qian; Qian Zhao; Fangwu Liu; Tao Zhang; Jiaxi Zhou; Ying Gu; Guoliang Xia; Enkui Duan
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 6.831

4.  Rotary suspension culture enhances mesendoderm differentiation of embryonic stem cells through modulation of Wnt/β-catenin pathway.

Authors:  Xiaohua Lei; Zhili Deng; Huishan Zhang; Huashan Zhao; Jiaxi Zhou; Shuang Liu; Qi Chen; Lina Ning; Yujing Cao; Xinyue Wang; Xudong Zhang; Enkui Duan
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 5.  Physical, Spatial, and Molecular Aspects of Extracellular Matrix of In Vivo Niches and Artificial Scaffolds Relevant to Stem Cells Research.

Authors:  Maria Akhmanova; Egor Osidak; Sergey Domogatsky; Sergey Rodin; Anna Domogatskaya
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2015-08-16       Impact factor: 5.443

6.  Cell Adhesion Minimization by a Novel Mesh Culture Method Mechanically Directs Trophoblast Differentiation and Self-Assembly Organization of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Authors:  Kennedy Omondi Okeyo; Osamu Kurosawa; Satoshi Yamazaki; Hidehiro Oana; Hidetoshi Kotera; Hiromitsu Nakauchi; Masao Washizu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 7.  Mechanical forces direct stem cell behaviour in development and regeneration.

Authors:  Kyle H Vining; David J Mooney
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 8.  Bridging the Gap: From 2D Cell Culture to 3D Microengineered Extracellular Matrices.

Authors:  Yanfen Li; Kristopher A Kilian
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 9.933

9.  A biomimetic synthetic feeder layer supports the proliferation and self-renewal of mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Cristina López-Fagundo; Liane L Livi; Talisha Ramchal; Eric M Darling; Diane Hoffman-Kim
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 10.  Extracellular matrix elasticity and topography: material-based cues that affect cell function via conserved mechanisms.

Authors:  Isaac A Janson; Andrew J Putnam
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 4.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.