Literature DB >> 24529050

Mammographic and ultrasound features of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.

Alan J Porter1, Elizabeth B Evans, Loani M Foxcroft, Peter T Simpson, Sunil R Lakhani.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Invasive lobular cancer (ILC) is an important contributor to false negative mammography. This study aims to assess the value of digital mammography and to identify imaging features that could assist the radiologist to suggest the diagnosis of ILC prior to biopsy.
METHODS: Three hundred sixty-one cases of pure ILC diagnosed at the Wesley Breast Clinic during the period 1995-2010 were reviewed by one of the authors (AP). Radiological features were categorized, and clinical features and needle sampling results were recorded.
RESULTS: Mammography was negative in 29.9% of ILCs. The commonest positive finding was a localized spiculated mass (41.8%). Thirty-four point nine per cent of lesions were visible in only one view, usually cranio-caudal. Calcification was not a feature of ILC. The use of digital mammography in 30% of cases did not decrease the false negative rate for ILC. Breast ultrasound (BUS) showed an abnormality in 97.8%, most commonly a localized irregular hypoechoic mass with shadowing.
CONCLUSIONS: Digital mammography does not reduce false negative mammography in ILC. The poor visibility of ILCs may be partly related to their low density (mass/unit volume). ILCs may sometimes be poor attenuators of X-rays but excellent attenuators of ultrasound, causing marked acoustic shadowing. Bilateral whole BUS has a very low false negative rate in experienced hands and is mandatory in symptomatic women. The combination of poor visibility on mammography with high visibility on ultrasound, as well as certain characteristic ultrasound appearances of ILC, may enable the radiologist to suggest ILC as a diagnostic possibility, prior to biopsy.
© 2013 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast neoplasms; breast ultrasound; digital mammography; lobular carcinoma; mammography

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24529050     DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1754-9477            Impact factor:   1.735


  13 in total

Review 1.  CDH1 germline mutations and hereditary lobular breast cancer.

Authors:  Giovanni Corso; Mattia Intra; Chiara Trentin; Paolo Veronesi; Viviana Galimberti
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 2.  Comprehensive Review of Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Features of Invasive Lobular Cancer.

Authors:  Nikhil Pramod; Akanksha Nigam; Mustafa Basree; Resham Mawalkar; Saba Mehra; Neelam Shinde; Gary Tozbikian; Nicole Williams; Sarmila Majumder; Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-03-16

Review 3.  Breast Cancer Screening: a Paradigm Change Is Needed-the PB Desai Oration.

Authors:  Ismail Jatoi
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-12-03

4.  Imaging features and conspicuity of invasive lobular carcinomas on digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Foucauld Chamming's; Ellen Kao; Ann Aldis; Romuald Ferré; Atilla Omeroglu; Caroline Reinhold; Benoit Mesurolle
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Imaging features of breast cancers on digital breast tomosynthesis according to molecular subtype: association with breast cancer detection.

Authors:  Su Hyun Lee; Jung Min Chang; Sung Ui Shin; A Jung Chu; Ann Yi; Nariya Cho; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Truncated ASPP2 Drives Initiation and Progression of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma via Distinct Mechanisms.

Authors:  Koen Schipper; Anne Paulien Drenth; Eline van der Burg; Samuel Cornelissen; Sjoerd Klarenbeek; Micha Nethe; Jos Jonkers
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Cumulative Risk Distribution for Interval Invasive Second Breast Cancers After Negative Surveillance Mammography.

Authors:  Janie M Lee; Linn Abraham; Diana L Lam; Diana S M Buist; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana L Miglioretti; Nehmat Houssami; Constance D Lehman; Louise M Henderson; Rebecca A Hubbard
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Lobular breast cancer series: imaging.

Authors:  Karen Johnson; Deba Sarma; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Case report: acute abdominal pain in a 37-year-old patient and the consequences for his family.

Authors:  Elisabeth Niemeyer; Hamid Mofid; Carsten Zornig; Eike-Christian Burandt; Alexander Stein; Andreas Block; Alexander E Volk
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-05-03       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Response of metastatic mouse invasive lobular carcinoma to mTOR inhibition is partly mediated by the adaptive immune system.

Authors:  Sjoerd Klarenbeek; Chris W Doornebal; Sjors M Kas; Nicola Bonzanni; Jinhyuk Bhin; Tanya M Braumuller; Ingrid van der Heijden; Mark Opdam; Philip C Schouten; Kelly Kersten; Roebi de Bruijn; Daniel Zingg; Julia Yemelyanenko; Lodewyk F A Wessels; Karin E de Visser; Jos Jonkers
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 8.110

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.