| Literature DB >> 24528557 |
Claudia H Overath1, Stephanie Darabaneanu, Marie C Evers, Wolf-Dieter Gerber, Melanie Graf, Armin Keller, Uwe Niederberger, Henrik Schäl, Michael Siniatchkin, Burkhard Weisser.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Migraine is a disorder of central information processing which is characterized by a reduced habituation of event-related potentials. There might be positive effects of aerobic exercise on brain function and pain. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of exercise on information processing and clinical course of migraine.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24528557 PMCID: PMC4017768 DOI: 10.1186/1129-2377-15-11
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Headache Pain ISSN: 1129-2369 Impact factor: 7.277
Clinical characteristics of the patient group
| 28 | 5 (17.9) | 23 (82.1) | 22 (87.6) | 6 (21.4) | 43.4 (9.7) | 19.9 (9.9) |
MO = migraine without aura; MA = migraine with aura.
Comparision of means for TMT-A, TMT-B, d2-letter cancellation test, iCNV-amplitude and habituation of iCNV
| 2.51 | 8.06 | 1.79 | 32 | ||
| −10.00 | 27.39 | −2.10 | 32 | ||
| 10.81 | 18.88 | 3.30 | 32 | ||
| −18.94 | 26.69 | −4.08 | 32 | ||
| −35.79 | 76.70 | −2.68 | 32 | ||
| −21.09 | 43.33 | −2.80 | 32 | ||
| -.64 | 10.46 | -.35 | 32 | .37 | |
| -.75 | 2.11 | −1.98 | 30 | ||
| -.38 | .95 | −2.21 | 30 |
n.s. = non-significant, MDiff = difference in means; SDDiff = difference in standard deviation; t = t-Wert; df = degrees of freedom; sig. = significance; *p < ,05;.
Figure 1Differences of means for TMT-A and TMT-B before the training (t1) and after the training (t2). On the left demonstrated in seconds and on the right in percentile rank.
Figure 2Differences of means for parameters of d2-LCT before the training (t1) and after the training (t2).
Figure 3Grand average of CNV-amplitudes among all subjects before the training (black) and after the training (grey).
Figure 4Differences of means for iCNV before the training (t1) and after the training (t2) for each patient.
Figure 5Illustration of iCNV-dishabituation before the training (measurement 1) and iCNV- habituation after the training (measurement 2). The figure shows mean amplitudes of the iCNV among the blocks of recording for all subjects and the regression line demonstrating the trend of dishabituation or habituation.
Figure 6Differences of habituation coefficient before the training (t1) and after the training (t2) for each patient.