Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 On the persistence of low power in psychological science.

Literature DB >> 24528377

On the persistence of low power in psychological science.

Ivan Vankov¹, Jeffrey Bowers, Marcus R Munafò.

Abstract

Entities: Chemical

Mesh：

Year: 2014 PMID： 24528377 PMCID： PMC4961230 DOI： 10.1080/17470218.2014.885986

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) ISSN： 1747-0218 Impact factor: 2.143

× No keyword cloud information.

13 in total

Review 1. Sifting the evidence-what's wrong with significance tests?

Authors: J A Sterne; G Davey Smith
Journal: BMJ Date: 2001-01-27

2. The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: a review.

Authors: J COHEN
Journal: J Abnorm Soc Psychol Date: 1962-09

3. False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant.

Authors: Joseph P Simmons; Leif D Nelson; Uri Simonsohn
Journal: Psychol Sci Date: 2011-10-17

4. Spurious genetic associations.

Authors: Patrick F Sullivan
Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2007-03-08 Impact factor: 13.382

5. Misuse of power: in defence of small-scale science.

Authors: Philip T Quinlan
Journal: Nat Rev Neurosci Date: 2013-07-03 Impact factor: 34.870

6. US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research.

Authors: Daniele Fanelli; John P A Ioannidis
Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-08-26 Impact factor: 11.205

7. Citation opportunity cost of the high impact factor obsession.

Authors: Cağan H Sekercioğlu
Journal: Curr Biol Date: 2013-09-09 Impact factor: 10.834

8. Bias in genetic association studies: effects of research location and resources.

Authors: Marcus R Munafò; Angela S Attwood; Jonathan Flint
Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 7.723

9. A peculiar prevalence of p values just below .05.

Authors: E J Masicampo; Daniel R Lalande
Journal: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) Date: 2012-08-02 Impact factor: 2.143

10. Local literature bias in genetic epidemiology: an empirical evaluation of the Chinese literature.

Authors: Zhenglun Pan; Thomas A Trikalinos; Fotini K Kavvoura; Joseph Lau; John P A Ioannidis
Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2005-11-22 Impact factor: 11.069

19 in total

1. Contextual sensitivity in scientific reproducibility.

Authors: Jay J Van Bavel; Peter Mende-Siedlecki; William J Brady; Diego A Reinero
Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 11.205

2. Crisis or self-correction: Rethinking media narratives about the well-being of science.

Authors: Kathleen Hall Jamieson
Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-03-13 Impact factor: 11.205

3. Questionable Research Practices, Low Statistical Power, and Other Obstacles to Replicability: Why Preclinical Neuroscience Research Would Benefit from Registered Reports.

Authors: Randall J Ellis
Journal: eNeuro Date: 2022-08-03

On the persistence of low power in psychological science.

Review 1. Sifting the evidence-what's wrong with significance tests?

2. The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: a review.

3. False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant.

4. Spurious genetic associations.

5. Misuse of power: in defence of small-scale science.

6. US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research.

7. Citation opportunity cost of the high impact factor obsession.

8. Bias in genetic association studies: effects of research location and resources.

9. A peculiar prevalence of p values just below .05.

10. Local literature bias in genetic epidemiology: an empirical evaluation of the Chinese literature.

1. Contextual sensitivity in scientific reproducibility.

2. Crisis or self-correction: Rethinking media narratives about the well-being of science.

3. Questionable Research Practices, Low Statistical Power, and Other Obstacles to Replicability: Why Preclinical Neuroscience Research Would Benefit from Registered Reports.

4. Sample size, statistical power, and false conclusions in infant looking-time research.

Review 5. Significance chasing in research practice: causes, consequences and possible solutions.

6. Is the call to abandon p-values the red herring of the replicability crisis?

7. Excess success for three related papers on racial bias.

8. The pervasive avoidance of prospective statistical power: major consequences and practical solutions.

9. The natural selection of bad science.

10. Preventing the ends from justifying the means: withholding results to address publication bias in peer-review.