Literature DB >> 24528169

Mechanisms of oncogenic chromosomal translocations.

Michael Byrne1, Justin Wray, Brian Reinert, Yuehan Wu, Jac Nickoloff, Suk-Hee Lee, Robert Hromas, Elizabeth Williamson.   

Abstract

Chromosome translocations are caused by inappropriate religation of two DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in heterologous chromosomes. These DSBs can be generated by endogenous or exogenous sources. Endogenous sources of DSBs leading to translocations include inappropriate recombination activating gene (RAG) or activation-induced deaminase (AID) activity during immune receptor maturation. Endogenous DSBs can also occur at noncanonical DNA structures or at collapsed replication forks. Exogenous sources of DSBs leading to translocations include ionizing radiation (IR) and cancer chemotherapy. Spatial proximity of the heterologous chromosomes is also important for translocations. While three distinct pathways for DNA DSB repair exist, mounting evidence supports alternative nonhomologous end joining (aNHEJ) as the predominant pathway through which the majority of translocations occur. Initiated by poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1), aNHEJ is utilized less frequently in DNA DSB repair than other forms of DSB repair. We recently found that PARP1 is essential for chromosomal translocations to occur and that small molecule PARP1 inhibitors, already in clinical use, can inhibit translocations generated by IR or topoisomerase II inhibition. These data confirm the central role of PARP1 in aNHEJ-mediated chromosomal translocations and raise the possibility of using clinically available PARP1 inhibitors in patients who are at high risk for secondary oncogenic chromosomal translocations.
© 2014 New York Academy of Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA end-joining repair; DNA repair; chromosomal translocation; oncogenesis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24528169     DOI: 10.1111/nyas.12370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  12 in total

1.  c-MYC Generates Repair Errors via Increased Transcription of Alternative-NHEJ Factors, LIG3 and PARP1, in Tyrosine Kinase-Activated Leukemias.

Authors:  Nidal Muvarak; Shannon Kelley; Carine Robert; Maria R Baer; Danilo Perrotti; Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini; Curt Civin; Kara Scheibner; Feyruz V Rassool
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 5.852

2.  Altered polymerase theta expression promotes chromosomal instability in salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma.

Authors:  Han Bai; Shilin Xia; Lei Zhu; Yan Dong; Chao Liu; Nan Li; Han Liu; Jing Xiao
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 5.295

3.  Histone deacetylase inhibitors decrease NHEJ both by acetylation of repair factors and trapping of PARP1 at DNA double-strand breaks in chromatin.

Authors:  Carine Robert; Pratik K Nagaria; Nisha Pawar; Adeoluwa Adewuyi; Ivana Gojo; David J Meyers; Philip A Cole; Feyruz V Rassool
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.156

4.  Possible Relationship Between MYBL1 Alterations and Specific Primary Sites in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: A Clinicopathological and Molecular Study of 36 Cases.

Authors:  Yukari Endo; Satoshi Kuwamoto; Takahito Ohira; Michiko Matsushita; Takahiro Matsushige; Takahiro Fukuhara; Shu Nakamoto; Kazuhiko Hayashi; Hiroyuki Kugoh; Yasuaki Hirooka
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 1.641

5.  Secondary structure forming sequences drive SD-MMEJ repair of DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Varandt Y Khodaverdian; Terrence Hanscom; Amy Marie Yu; Taylor L Yu; Victoria Mak; Alexander J Brown; Steven A Roberts; Mitch McVey
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Elevated PTTG and PBF predicts poor patient outcome and modulates DNA damage response genes in thyroid cancer.

Authors:  M L Read; J C Fong; B Modasia; A Fletcher; W Imruetaicharoenchoke; R J Thompson; H Nieto; J J Reynolds; A Bacon; U Mallick; A Hackshaw; J C Watkinson; K Boelaert; A S Turnell; V E Smith; C J McCabe
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  Progressive genomic instability in the Nup98-HoxD13 model of MDS correlates with loss of the PIG-A gene product.

Authors:  Michael Byrne; Richard L Bennett; Xiaodong Cheng; W Stratford May
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 8.  Novel Biological Approaches for Testing the Contributions of Single DSBs and DSB Clusters to the Biological Effects of High LET Radiation.

Authors:  Veronika Mladenova; Emil Mladenov; George Iliakis
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 9.  DNA Damage and Pulmonary Hypertension.

Authors:  Benoît Ranchoux; Jolyane Meloche; Roxane Paulin; Olivier Boucherat; Steeve Provencher; Sébastien Bonnet
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Breast Cancer Induced by X-Ray Mammography Screening? A Review Based on Recent Understanding of Low-Dose Radiobiology.

Authors:  Ernest K J Pauwels; Nicolas Foray; Michel H Bourguignon
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 1.927

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.