Heather E Vezina1, Richard C Brundage, Henry H Balfour. 1. Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Abstract
AIM: Our aims were to quantify ganciclovir pharmacokinetics in paediatric and adult kidney, liver and lung transplant patients taking a range of valganciclovir doses to prevent herpes virus infections, including a 450 mg regimen, and to identify sources of pharmacokinetic variability. METHOD: Plasma samples were collected at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks post-transplant and at 4, 6, 8 and 12 months post-transplant in subjects prescribed longer courses. Ganciclovir was measured by liquid chromatography/ultraviolet detection. Non-linear mixed effects modelling was used to analyze the concentration-time data and evaluate demographic and transplant-related covariates. RESULTS: A two compartment model with first order absorption best described the data. Given the range of body sizes, clearance and volume of distribution terms were scaled using standard weight-based allometric exponents. Creatinine clearance was included on apparent oral clearance. Final estimates in a standard 70 kg individual for apparent oral clearance, central volume of distribution, intercompartmental clearance and peripheral volume of distribution were 14.5 l h(-1) , 87.5 l, 4.80 l h(-1) and 42.6 l, respectively. The median terminal half-life for kidney, liver and lung transplant recipients was 9.4, 9.5 and 8.2 h, respectively. Median exposure (i.e. AUC(0,∞) in subjects taking valganciclovir 900 mg or 450 mg once daily was 57.4 and 34.3 μg ml(-1) h, respectively. CONCLUSION: Allometric scaling allowed simultaneous analysis of data from children and adults. Ganciclovir pharmacokinetics were similar among kidney, liver and lung transplant recipients. Ganciclovir exposure after valganciclovir 450 mg once daily may be suboptimal in some individuals and requires evaluation along with virologic outcomes data.
AIM: Our aims were to quantify ganciclovir pharmacokinetics in paediatric and adult kidney, liver and lung transplant patients taking a range of valganciclovir doses to prevent herpes virus infections, including a 450 mg regimen, and to identify sources of pharmacokinetic variability. METHOD: Plasma samples were collected at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks post-transplant and at 4, 6, 8 and 12 months post-transplant in subjects prescribed longer courses. Ganciclovir was measured by liquid chromatography/ultraviolet detection. Non-linear mixed effects modelling was used to analyze the concentration-time data and evaluate demographic and transplant-related covariates. RESULTS: A two compartment model with first order absorption best described the data. Given the range of body sizes, clearance and volume of distribution terms were scaled using standard weight-based allometric exponents. Creatinine clearance was included on apparent oral clearance. Final estimates in a standard 70 kg individual for apparent oral clearance, central volume of distribution, intercompartmental clearance and peripheral volume of distribution were 14.5 l h(-1) , 87.5 l, 4.80 l h(-1) and 42.6 l, respectively. The median terminal half-life for kidney, liver and lung transplant recipients was 9.4, 9.5 and 8.2 h, respectively. Median exposure (i.e. AUC(0,∞) in subjects taking valganciclovir 900 mg or 450 mg once daily was 57.4 and 34.3 μg ml(-1) h, respectively. CONCLUSION: Allometric scaling allowed simultaneous analysis of data from children and adults. Ganciclovir pharmacokinetics were similar among kidney, liver and lung transplant recipients. Ganciclovir exposure after valganciclovir 450 mg once daily may be suboptimal in some individuals and requires evaluation along with virologic outcomes data.
Authors: Scott M Palmer; Ajit P Limaye; Missy Banks; Dianne Gallup; Jeffrey Chapman; E Clinton Lawrence; Jordan Dunitz; Aaron Milstone; John Reynolds; Gordon L Yung; Kevin M Chan; Robert Aris; Edward Garrity; Vincent Valentine; Jonathan McCall; Shein-Chung Chow; Robert Duane Davis; Robin Avery Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2010-06-15 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Atul Humar; Ajit P Limaye; Emily A Blumberg; Ingeborg A Hauser; Flavio Vincenti; Alan G Jardine; Daniel Abramowicz; Jane A L Ives; Mahdi Farhan; Patrick Peeters Journal: Transplantation Date: 2010-12-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Steven Gabardi; Colm C Magee; Steven A Baroletti; John A Powelson; Jennifer L Cina; Anil K Chandraker Journal: Pharmacotherapy Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 4.705
Authors: M D Pescovitz; R B Ettenger; C F Strife; J R Sherbotie; S E Thomas; S McDiarmid; S Bartosh; J Ives; M R Bouw; J Bucuvalas Journal: Transpl Infect Dis Date: 2009-12-04 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: T Nguyen; M Oualha; C Briand; M Bendavid; A Béranger; S Benaboud; J-M Tréluyer; Y Zheng; F Foissac; S Winter; I Gana; S Boujaafar; V Lopez; R Berthaud; Z Demir; N Bouazza; D Hirt Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2021-02-17 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: A Facchin; V Elie; N Benyoub; S Magreault; A Maisin; T Storme; W Zhao; G Deschenes; E Jacqz-Aigrain Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2019-09-16 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Mohd H Abdul-Aziz; Jan-Willem C Alffenaar; Matteo Bassetti; Hendrik Bracht; George Dimopoulos; Deborah Marriott; Michael N Neely; Jose-Artur Paiva; Federico Pea; Fredrik Sjovall; Jean F Timsit; Andrew A Udy; Sebastian G Wicha; Markus Zeitlinger; Jan J De Waele; Jason A Roberts Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2020-05-07 Impact factor: 17.440