Anne C Kirchhoff1, Gary Hart, Eric G Campbell. 1. Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah; Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We evaluated whether primary care physicians (PCPs) from urban and rural practices differ on attitudes and behaviors related to quality improvement (QI) activities, patient relationships, and professionalism/self-regulation. METHODS: Data from a national survey that assessed physician attitudes and behaviors based on the Physician Charter on Medical Professionalism were used. Of the 1,891 survey respondents, N = 840 were PCPs (n = 274 family medicine (response rate = 67.5%); n = 257 general internal medicine (60.8%); and n = 309 pediatricians (72.7%)). Using Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes, PCPs were classified as urban and rural according to their practice ZIP code. FINDINGS: A total of n = 691 physicians were urban and n = 127 rural. Attitudes regarding participating in QI did not differ by practice location; however, rural PCPs were more likely to have reviewed an other physician's records for QI than urban PCPs (65.6% vs 48.0%, P < .001). Rural physicians were more likely to agree that physicians should talk with their patients about the cost of care than urban PCPs (40.5% vs 29.2%, P = .02). While all PCPs endorsed attitudes regarding the importance of professional behaviors (eg, reporting impaired/incompetent colleagues, disclosing medical errors) at generally similar levels, their behaviors differed. More rural physicians had a personal knowledge of an impaired/incompetent physician than urban physicians (20.7% vs 12.7%, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: PCPs from rural and urban areas share similar attitudes regarding the importance of participating in QI and fulfilling professional responsibilities. However, certain behaviors (eg, knowledge of impaired colleagues) do differ. These results should be confirmed in larger studies of rural PCPs.
PURPOSE: We evaluated whether primary care physicians (PCPs) from urban and rural practices differ on attitudes and behaviors related to quality improvement (QI) activities, patient relationships, and professionalism/self-regulation. METHODS: Data from a national survey that assessed physician attitudes and behaviors based on the Physician Charter on Medical Professionalism were used. Of the 1,891 survey respondents, N = 840 were PCPs (n = 274 family medicine (response rate = 67.5%); n = 257 general internal medicine (60.8%); and n = 309 pediatricians (72.7%)). Using Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes, PCPs were classified as urban and rural according to their practice ZIP code. FINDINGS: A total of n = 691 physicians were urban and n = 127 rural. Attitudes regarding participating in QI did not differ by practice location; however, rural PCPs were more likely to have reviewed an other physician's records for QI than urban PCPs (65.6% vs 48.0%, P < .001). Rural physicians were more likely to agree that physicians should talk with their patients about the cost of care than urban PCPs (40.5% vs 29.2%, P = .02). While all PCPs endorsed attitudes regarding the importance of professional behaviors (eg, reporting impaired/incompetent colleagues, disclosing medical errors) at generally similar levels, their behaviors differed. More rural physicians had a personal knowledge of an impaired/incompetent physician than urban physicians (20.7% vs 12.7%, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: PCPs from rural and urban areas share similar attitudes regarding the importance of participating in QI and fulfilling professional responsibilities. However, certain behaviors (eg, knowledge of impaired colleagues) do differ. These results should be confirmed in larger studies of rural PCPs.
Authors: Liselotte N Dyrbye; Colin P West; Andrea Leep Hunderfund; Christine A Sinsky; Mickey Trockel; Michael Tutty; Lindsey Carlasare; Daniel Satele; Tait Shanafelt Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-11-16 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Charles R Rogers; Kevin M Korous; Ellen Brooks; Mary A De Vera; Fa Tuuhetaufa; Todd Lucas; Karen Curtin; Curt Pesman; Wenora Johnson; Phuong Gallagher; Justin X Moore Journal: Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book Date: 2022-04
Authors: Paul J Joudrey; Nicholas Chadi; Payel Roy; Kenneth L Morford; Paxton Bach; Simeon Kimmel; Emily A Wang; Susan L Calcaterra Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2020-03-27 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Elizabeth C Saunders; Sarah K Moore; Trip Gardner; Sarah Farkas; Lisa A Marsch; Bethany McLeman; Andrea Meier; Noah Nesin; John Rotrosen; Olivia Walsh; Jennifer McNeely Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Justin Xavier Moore; Kendra J Royston; Marvin E Langston; Russell Griffin; Bertha Hidalgo; Henry E Wang; Graham Colditz; Tomi Akinyemiju Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2018-06-19 Impact factor: 2.506