Literature DB >> 24528057

CEA, AFP, CA125, CA153 and CA199 in malignant pleural effusions predict the cause.

Xin-Feng Wang1, Yan-Hua Wu, Mao-Shui Wang, Yun-Shan Wang.   

Abstract

Determination of the cause of malignant pleural effusions is important for treatment and management, especially in cases of unknown primaries. There are limited biomarkers available for prediction of the cause of malignant pleural effusion in clinical practice. Hence, we evaluated pleural levels of five tumor biomarkers (CEA, AFP, CA125, CA153 and CA199) in predicting the cause of malignant pleural effusion in a retrospective study. Kruskal-Wallis or Mann-Whitney U tests were carried out to compare levels of tumor markers in pleural effusion among different forms of neoplasia - lung squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or small cell carcinoma, mesothelioma, breast cancer, lymphoma/leukemia and miscellaneous. Receiver operator characteristic analysis was performed to evaluate sensitivity and specificity of biomarkers. The Kruskal-Wallis test showed significant differences in levels of pleural effusion CEA (P<0.01), AFP (P<0.01), CA153 (P<0.01) and CA199 (P<0.01), but not CA125 (P>0.05), among the seven groups. Receiver operator characteristic analysis showed that, compared with other four tumor markers, CA153 was the best biomarker in diagnosing malignant pleural effusions of lung adenocarcinoma (area under curve (AUC): 0.838 (95%confidence interval: 0.787, 0.888); cut-off value: 10.2U/ ml; sensitivity: 73.2% (64.4-80.8)%, specificity: 85.2% (77.8-90.8)%), lung squamous cell carcinoma (AUC: 0.716 (0.652, 0.780); cut-off value: 14.2U/ml; sensitivity: 57.6% (50.7-64.3)%, specificity: 91.2% (76.3-98.0)%), and small-cell lung cancer (AUC: 0.812 (0.740, 0.884); cut-off value: 9.7U/ml; sensitivity: 61.5% (55.0-67.8)%, specificity: 94.1% (71.2-99.0)%); CEA was the best biomarker in diagnosing MPEs of mesothelioma (AUC: 0.726 (0.593, 0.858); cut-off value: 1.43ng/ml; sensitivity: 83.7% (78.3-88.2)%, specificity: 61.1% (35.8-82.6)%) and lymphoma/leukemia (AUC: 0.923 (0.872, 0.974); cut-off value: 1.71ng/ml; sensitivity: 82.8% (77.4-87.3)%, specificity: 92.3% (63.9-98.7)%). Thus CA153 and CEA appear to be good biomarkers in diagnosing different causes of malignant pleural effusion. Our findings implied that the two tumor markers may improve the diagnosis and treatment for effusions of unknown primaries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24528057     DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.1.363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 1513-7368


  22 in total

1.  [Detection of carcinoembryonic antigen levels in pleural effusion and serum and their ratio for differential diagnosis of pleural effusion resulting from tuberculosis and lung cancer].

Authors:  Ruicheng Li; Zhaowei Gao; Ke Dong; Huiping Wang; Huizhong Zhang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2019-02-28

2.  Diagnostic value of soluble receptor-binding cancer antigen expressed on SiSo cells and carcinoembryonic antigen in differentiating malignant from benign pleural effusion.

Authors:  Jiahui Dong; Gengyun Sun; Hongbin Zhu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-10-05

3.  Diagnostic value of tumor markers for lung adenocarcinoma-associated malignant pleural effusion: a validation study and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mei Feng; Jing Zhu; Liqun Liang; Ni Zeng; Yanqiu Wu; Chun Wan; Yongchun Shen; Fuqiang Wen
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Glycosylation in cancer: its application as a biomarker and recent advances of analytical techniques.

Authors:  Yoshimi Haga; Koji Ueda
Journal:  Glycoconj J       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 2.916

5.  Circulating low IL-23: IL-35 cytokine ratio promotes progression associated with poor prognosisin breast cancer.

Authors:  Guanghui Chen; Yanfang Liang; Xin Guan; Hui Chen; Qiankun Liu; Bihua Lin; Can Chen; Mingyuan Huang; Jianan Chen; Weiquan Wu; Yi Liang; Keyuan Zhou; Jincheng Zeng
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

6.  The clinical performance evaluation of novel protein chips for eleven biomarkers detection and the diagnostic model study.

Authors:  Yuan Luo; Xu Zhu; Pengjun Zhang; Qian Shen; Zi Wang; Xinyu Wen; Ling Wang; Jing Gao; Jin Dong; Caie Yang; Tangming Wu; Zheng Zhu; Yaping Tian
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

7.  Carcinoembryonic antigen-positive pleural effusion in early stage non-small cell lung cancer without pleural infiltration.

Authors:  Njanja Enz; Fernando Fragoso; Alexander Gamrekeli; Frank Lippek; Wolfgang Jungraithmayr
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Identifying Thoracic Malignancies Through Pleural Fluid Biomarkers: A Predictive Multivariate Model.

Authors:  José M Porcel; Aureli Esquerda; Montserrat Martínez-Alonso; Silvia Bielsa; Antonieta Salud
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Comparison of serum biochemical markers in patients with mesothelioma and pleural plaques versus healthy individuals exposed to environmental asbestos.

Authors:  İsa Döngel; Ali Akbaş; İsmail Benli; Mehmet Bayram
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 0.332

Review 10.  Ascites modulates cancer cell behavior, contributing to tumor heterogeneity in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Soochi Kim; Boyun Kim; Yong Sang Song
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 6.716

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.