Literature DB >> 24527986

Dynamic stimuli: accentuating aesthetic preference biases.

Trista E Friedrich1, Victoria L Harms, Lorin J Elias.   

Abstract

Despite humans' preference for symmetry, artwork often portrays asymmetrical characteristics that influence the viewer's aesthetic preference for the image. When presented with asymmetrical images, aesthetic preference is often given to images whose content flows from left-to-right and whose mass is located on the right of the image. Cerebral lateralization has been suggested to account for the left-to-right directionality bias; however, the influence of cultural factors, such as scanning habits, on aesthetic preference biases is debated. The current research investigates aesthetic preference for mobile objects and landscapes, as previous research has found contrasting preference for the two image types. Additionally, the current experiment examines the effects of dynamic movement on directionality preference to test the assumption that static images are perceived as aesthetically equivalent to dynamic images. After viewing mirror-imaged pairs of pictures and videos, right-to-left readers failed to show a preference bias, whereas left-to-right readers preferred stimuli with left-to-right directionality regardless of the location of the mass. The directionality bias in both reading groups was accentuated by the videos, but the bias was significantly stronger in left-to-right readers. The findings suggest that scanning habits moderate the leftward bias resulting from hemispheric specialization and that dynamic stimuli further fluent visual processing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aesthetic preference; Dynamic stimuli; Laterality; Reading direction; Right hemisphere

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24527986     DOI: 10.1080/1357650X.2014.886585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laterality        ISSN: 1357-650X


  7 in total

Review 1.  Anticlockwise or clockwise? A dynamic Perception-Action-Laterality model for directionality bias in visuospatial functioning.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Michael J Proulx; Lora T Likova
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Abstract concepts: external influences, internal constraints, and methodological issues.

Authors:  Anna M Borghi; Samuel Shaki; Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-07-04

3.  The subconscious impact of line orientations in background images on memory of Chinese written characters.

Authors:  Yanqun Huang; Yi Zhang; Xu Li; Jie Zhang; Yuzhen Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 4.  Is Beauty in the Hand of the Writer? Influences of Aesthetic Preferences through Script Directions, Cultural, and Neurological Factors: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Alexander G Page; Chris McManus; Carmen P González; Sobh Chahboun
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-03

5.  Directionality in Aesthetic Judgments and Performance Evaluation: Sport Judges and Laypeople Compared.

Authors:  Florian Loffing; Stefanie Nickel; Norbert Hagemann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-12-05

6.  Newborn chicks need no number tricks. Commentary: Number-space mapping in the newborn chick resembles humans' mental number line.

Authors:  Samuel Shaki; Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Accuracy of Outcome Anticipation, But Not Gaze Behavior, Differs Against Left- and Right-Handed Penalties in Team-Handball Goalkeeping.

Authors:  Florian Loffing; Florian Sölter; Norbert Hagemann; Bernd Strauss
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-12-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.