BACKGROUND: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have shown significant therapeutic potential in preclinical animal models of wound healing. However, the translation of MSC-based therapeutics to clinical practice has been delayed by questions including the mechanisms of MSC homing, engraftment, and ultimate function. THE PROBLEM: Experimental models of MSC-based wound therapies often involve intravenous injection of cells followed by sacrifice of animals at various time points and detection of MSCs in wounds by histological methods. However, this methodology is limited by its sampling of only specific tissue at a single time point and provides no information about how exogenously transplanted MSCs home to the wound environment. BASIC/CLINICAL SCIENCE ADVANCES: Most systemically injected MSCs initially become entrapped within the lungs before migrating out to the liver and spleen in the normal state. When an injury is present, after the initial lung entrapment, MSCs migrate in response to inflammatory mediators and home to sites of wounding. CLINICAL CARE RELEVANCE: As MSC-based wound therapies continue to advance toward clinical trials, the availability of noninvasive methods to track cells after injection into patients affords the opportunity to monitor stem cell behavior post-transplantation. CONCLUSION: MSCs have demonstrated great promise as an emerging therapeutic for wound management. However, further preclinical studies will be needed to elucidate the reparative mechanisms of these cells and to determine how to optimize their regenerative potential.
BACKGROUND: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have shown significant therapeutic potential in preclinical animal models of wound healing. However, the translation of MSC-based therapeutics to clinical practice has been delayed by questions including the mechanisms of MSC homing, engraftment, and ultimate function. THE PROBLEM: Experimental models of MSC-based wound therapies often involve intravenous injection of cells followed by sacrifice of animals at various time points and detection of MSCs in wounds by histological methods. However, this methodology is limited by its sampling of only specific tissue at a single time point and provides no information about how exogenously transplanted MSCs home to the wound environment. BASIC/CLINICAL SCIENCE ADVANCES: Most systemically injected MSCs initially become entrapped within the lungs before migrating out to the liver and spleen in the normal state. When an injury is present, after the initial lung entrapment, MSCs migrate in response to inflammatory mediators and home to sites of wounding. CLINICAL CARE RELEVANCE: As MSC-based wound therapies continue to advance toward clinical trials, the availability of noninvasive methods to track cells after injection into patients affords the opportunity to monitor stem cell behavior post-transplantation. CONCLUSION: MSCs have demonstrated great promise as an emerging therapeutic for wound management. However, further preclinical studies will be needed to elucidate the reparative mechanisms of these cells and to determine how to optimize their regenerative potential.
Authors: Chandan K Sen; Gayle M Gordillo; Sashwati Roy; Robert Kirsner; Lynn Lambert; Thomas K Hunt; Finn Gottrup; Geoffrey C Gurtner; Michael T Longaker Journal: Wound Repair Regen Date: 2009 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.617
Authors: Ryang Hwa Lee; Andrey A Pulin; Min Jeong Seo; Daniel J Kota; Joni Ylostalo; Benjamin L Larson; Laura Semprun-Prieto; Patrice Delafontaine; Darwin J Prockop Journal: Cell Stem Cell Date: 2009-07-02 Impact factor: 24.633
Authors: Shannon Kidd; Erika Spaeth; Jennifer L Dembinski; Martin Dietrich; Keri Watson; Ann Klopp; Venkata Lokesh Battula; Micheal Weil; Michael Andreeff; Frank C Marini Journal: Stem Cells Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 6.277
Authors: Sabine Geiger; Emrah I Ozay; Ulf Geumann; Marina K Hereth; Terese Magnusson; Sudarvili Shanthalingam; Daniela Hirsch; Stefanie Kälin; Christine Günther; Barbara A Osborne; Gregory N Tew; Felix G Hermann; Lisa M Minter Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2019-05-16 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Chi Y Lo; Brian R Weil; Beth A Palka; Arezoo Momeni; John M Canty; Sriram Neelamegham Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2015-09-25 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Jun Lei; Wance Firdaus; Jason M Rosenzweig; Shorouq Alrebh; Ahmed Bakhshwin; Talaibek Borbiev; Ali Fatemi; Karin Blakemore; Michael V Johnston; Irina Burd Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2014-12-30 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: A M Thomas; S Li; C Chu; I Shats; J Xu; P A Calabresi; P C M van Zijl; P Walczak; J W M Bulte Journal: Exp Neurol Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 5.330