Literature DB >> 24527143

Commentary on the conversion to an advanced standard of care for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers and other chronic wounds.

Donald E Mrdjenovich1.   

Abstract

There have been notable contributions in the literature regarding the consensus for a new standard for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. The more recent advances in wound care therapies, modalities, and evidence-based research have demonstrated that an advanced standard of care for wound healing should exist. Failure of treatment protocols, which center on a 50% area of wound reduction within 4 weeks as a response to standard conventional care, should indicate the use of adjuvant therapies. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT), growth factors, human-derived bioengineered tissue, and extracellular matrix products are readily available. This commentary will explore a brief selection of the current wound care literature as it relates to the acceptance of a new advanced standard of care. Furthermore, the intention is to stimulate further discussion and thought on the relevance of this approach in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers and chronic wounds and how it may correlate with the ultimate outcome of healing in general.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjuvant therapy; Advanced standard of care; Bioengineered tissue; Chronic wounds; Diabetic ulcers; Extracellular matrix; HBOT; NPWT; Standard of care; Timely wound care; Wound healing; Wound management

Year:  2010        PMID: 24527143      PMCID: PMC3601923          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcws.2010.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Col Certif Wound Spec        ISSN: 1876-4983


  11 in total

1.  Percent change in wound area of diabetic foot ulcers over a 4-week period is a robust predictor of complete healing in a 12-week prospective trial.

Authors:  Peter Sheehan; Peter Jones; Antonella Caselli; John M Giurini; Aristidis Veves
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 2.  The extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction.

Authors:  Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.727

Review 3.  Clinical practice. Neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  Andrew J M Boulton; Robert S Kirsner; Loretta Vileikyte
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Guidelines for the treatment of diabetic ulcers.

Authors:  David L Steed; Christopher Attinger; Theodore Colaizzi; Mary Crossland; Michael Franz; Lawrence Harkless; Andrew Johnson; Hans Moosa; Martin Robson; Thomas Serena; Peter Sheehan; Aristidis Veves; Laurel Wiersma-Bryant
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.617

5.  Negative pressure wound therapy after partial diabetic foot amputation: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  David G Armstrong; Lawrence A Lavery
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-11-12       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Why "wet to dry"?

Authors:  Cynthia A Fleck
Journal:  J Am Col Certif Wound Spec       Date:  2009-10-06

7.  A post-hoc analysis of reduction in diabetic foot ulcer size at 4 weeks as a predictor of healing by 12 weeks.

Authors:  Robert J Snyder; Matthew Cardinal; Damien M Dauphinée; James Stavosky
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 2.629

8.  Hanging wet-to-dry dressings out to dry.

Authors:  L G Ovington
Journal:  Home Healthc Nurse       Date:  2001-08

Review 9.  Consensus Development Conference on Diabetic Foot Wound Care: 7-8 April 1999, Boston, Massachusetts. American Diabetes Association.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Pressure ulcer prevalence and the role of negative pressure wound therapy in home health quality outcomes.

Authors:  Tina Schwien; Jeff Gilbert; Christine Lang
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.629

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.