Literature DB >> 24527136

Use of alternatives to air-fluidized support surfaces in the care of complex wounds in postflap and postgraft patients.

Cynthia A Fleck1, Laurie M Rappl2, Richard Simman3, Virginia Titterington4, Jill Conwill5, Cathy Koerner6, Pam Locke7, Dawn Bechtold8, Cathie Papantonio9, Deborah P Gray10, Kathleen Lawrence11.   

Abstract

Air-fluidized support surface therapy has many drawbacks, such as dehydration, in an already difficult recovery for those wound patients who have undergone flap and graft surgery. In addition, patient care and handling are also problematic. Patients complain of discomfort, and the instability of the surface interferes with patient stability in side lying and semi-Fowler's positions. Alternative support surfaces can be considered for postflap or postgraft patients. Such technologies as alternating pressure, low-air-loss, and therapeutic nonpowered, advanced, and lateral rotation surfaces are widely used for pressure management in high-risk patients and those with existing pressure ulcers. These surfaces must be used within a total pressure ulcer management program that includes frequent turning and repositioning, skin and ulcer care according to evidence-based protocols, patient and caregiver instruction, nutrition, and offloading and positioning. The proposed recommendations require more research on the relative effectiveness of less expensive and more user-friendly support surfaces such as low-air-loss and nonpowered advanced support surfaces and is necessary in order to conclusively recommend one type of surface over another. However, at this time the available clinical studies and opinions remain positive.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air-fluidized therapy; Alternating pressure; Alternative support surfaces; Fasciocutaneous flap; High air loss; Low air loss; Myocutaneous flap; Postsurgical care; Pressure ulcer management; Split-thickness skin graft; Support surface; Therapeutic nonpowered advanced and lateral rotation

Year:  2010        PMID: 24527136      PMCID: PMC3601929          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcws.2010.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Col Certif Wound Spec        ISSN: 1876-4983


  5 in total

1.  Etiology of decubitus ulcers.

Authors:  M KOSIAK
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 2.  Preventing pressure ulcers: a systematic review.

Authors:  Madhuri Reddy; Sudeep S Gill; Paula A Rochon
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention.

Authors:  N Cullum; E McInnes; S E M Bell-Syer; R Legood
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004

4.  Surgical correction of pressure ulcers in an urban center: is it efficacious?

Authors:  G R Evans; C R Dufresne; P N Manson
Journal:  Adv Wound Care       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Evaluation of the effectiveness of two support surfaces following myocutaneous flap surgery.

Authors:  N G Economides; V A Skoutakis; C A Carter; V H Smith
Journal:  Adv Wound Care       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.730

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.