Literature DB >> 24526063

Does vancomycin have a future in the treatment of skin infections?

Deirdre J O'Brien1, Ian M Gould.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite concerns regarding efficacy and tolerability, vancomycin continues to be the standard treatment for skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) when β-lactam antimicrobials cannot be used. This review sought to establish the role of both old and new alternatives to vancomycin. Methods for achieving optimization of vancomycin therapy are also explored. RECENT
FINDINGS: Several meta-analyses have demonstrated poorer clinical outcomes when the vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration approaches the breakpoint of 2 μg/ml. Higher doses should be utilized to optimize pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics when higher volumes of distribution occur (e.g. sepsis). Newer agents with established noninferiority to vancomycin include the oxazolidinones linezolid and tedizolid, the lipopeptide daptomycin, the anti-meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus cephalosporin ceftaroline and the glycylcycline tigecycline. Linezolid is thus far the only agent that has been shown to be associated with better clinical and microbiological cure rates. Ceftaroline and tigecycline are broad-spectrum agents best reserved for polymicrobial infections (e.g. diabetic foot infections).
SUMMARY: When vancomycin is used for the treatment of SSTIs, maximizing the dose should be performed to improve efficacy. Cost is often the main limiting factor with regard to the newer agents, but their suitability for outpatient antimicrobial therapy may counteract this.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24526063     DOI: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis        ISSN: 0951-7375            Impact factor:   4.915


  4 in total

1.  Surface potential measurement of bacteria using Kelvin probe force microscopy.

Authors:  Eric Birkenhauer; Suresh Neethirajan
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 2.  Efficacy and safety of daptomycin for skin and soft tissue infections: a systematic review with trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Chao Liu; Zhi Mao; Mengmeng Yang; Hongjun Kang; Hui Liu; Liang Pan; Jie Hu; Jun Luo; Feihu Zhou
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 2.423

3.  Adaptation of Staphylococcus aureus in a Medium Mimicking a Diabetic Foot Environment.

Authors:  Cassandra Pouget; Claude-Alexandre Gustave; Christelle Ngba-Essebe; Frédéric Laurent; Emmanuel Lemichez; Anne Tristan; Albert Sotto; Catherine Dunyach-Rémy; Jean-Philippe Lavigne
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 4.546

4.  Role of Daptomycin in Cutaneous Wound Healing: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Giulio Rizzetto; Elisa Molinelli; Giulia Radi; Federico Diotallevi; Oscar Cirioni; Lucia Brescini; Andrea Giacometti; Annamaria Offidani; Oriana Simonetti
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.