Literature DB >> 24525884

Fetal reduction: 25 years' experience.

Mark I Evans1, Stephanie Andriole, David W Britt.   

Abstract

Fetal reduction (FR) began in the 1980s to salvage the pregnancies of couples needing fertility therapy who were finally successful but with too many fetuses. Since then, it has gone from a rarity performed in only the highest risk situations to an integral fail-safe of infertility practice. Our understanding of the problems of multiple and premature births has increased - even twins carry 4-5 times more risk than singletons. Evaluation of fetuses before FR has permitted more intelligent choices and improved resultant outcomes. We now perform chorionic villus sampling in approximately 85% of cases, obtain fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) results overnight, and then perform FR the next day. Decisions about which to reduce prioritize anomalies, but now can include fetal gender in the decision process, as couples are now just as likely to want girls as boys. In Mendelian cases, sophisticated molecular analyses permit diagnoses before FR, and new uses such as paternity analysis can be performed. Ethical arguments have also evolved; as with many technologies in which the start was for only 'life or death cases', FR has also moved into 'quality of life' issues. FR of twins to a singleton now compromise about 30% of our cases.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24525884     DOI: 10.1159/000357974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther        ISSN: 1015-3837            Impact factor:   2.587


  6 in total

1.  Fetal Reduction Could Improve but Not Completely Reverse the Pregnancy Outcomes of Multiple Pregnancies: Experience From a Single Center.

Authors:  Zhu Yimin; Tang Minyue; Fu Yanling; Yan Huanmiao; Sun Saijun; Li Qingfang; Hu Xiaoling; Xing Lanfeng
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 6.055

Review 2.  Resistance to Change.

Authors:  Mark I Evans; David W Britt
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Correlation analysis of adverse outcomes for the selective reduction of twin pregnancies.

Authors:  Li Gao; Qian-Qian Xu; Shan Wang; Yuan-Qing Xia; Xin-Rong Zhao; Yi Wu; Ren-Yi Hua; Jin-Ling Sun; Yan-Lin Wang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.105

4.  Pregnancy outcome following fetal reduction from dichorionic twins to singleton gestation.

Authors:  Gal Greenberg; Ron Bardin; Shir Danieli-Gruber; Kinneret Tenenbaum-Gavish; Anat Shmueli; Eyal Krispin; Galia Oron; Arnon Wiznitzer; Eran Hadar
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Trends of Selective Fetal Reduction and Selective Termination in Multiple Pregnancy, in England and Wales: a Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Sreya Sam; Sarah Tai-MacArthur; Panicos Shangaris; Srividhya Sankaran
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 3.060

6.  The risk of twin pregnancies should be minimized in patients with a unicornuate uterus undergoing IVF-ET.

Authors:  Yan Ouyang; Pei Cai; Fei Gong; Ge Lin; Jiabi Qin; Xihong Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.