Literature DB >> 24525543

Comparison of surgical techniques of 111 medial malleolar fractures classified by fracture geometry.

Nabil A Ebraheim1, Todd Ludwig, John T Weston, Trevor Carroll, Jiayong Liu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of operative techniques used for medial malleolar fractures by classifying fracture geometry has not been well documented.
METHODS: One hundred eleven patients with medial malleolar fractures (transverse n = 63, oblique n = 29, vertical n = 7, comminuted n = 12) were included in this study. Seventy-two patients had complicating comorbidities. All patients were treated with buttress plate, lag screw, tension band, or K-wire fixation. Treatment outcomes were evaluated on the basis of radiological outcome (union, malunion, delayed union, or nonunion), need for operative revision, presence of postoperative complications, and AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot score.
RESULTS: For transverse fractures, tension band fixation showed the highest rate of union (79%), highest average AOFAS score (86), lowest revision rate (5%), and lowest complication rate (16%). For oblique fractures, lag screws showed the highest rate of union (71%), highest average AOFAS score (80), lowest revision rate (19%), and lowest complication rate (33%) of the commonly used fixation techniques. For vertical fractures, buttress plating was used in every case but 1, achieving union (whether normal or delayed) in all cases with an average AOFAS score of 84, no revisions, and a 17% complication rate. Comminuted fractures had relatively poor outcomes regardless of fixation method.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that both tension bands and lag screws result in similar rates of union for transverse fractures of the medial malleolus, but that tension band constructs are associated with less need for revision surgery and fewer complications. In addition, our data demonstrate that oblique fractures were most effectively treated with lag screws and that vertical fractures attained superior outcomes with buttress plating. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative series.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ankle injuries; ankle injuries radiography; distal tibia fractures; fracture fixation methods; medial malleolus; treatment outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24525543     DOI: 10.1177/1071100714524553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  6 in total

1.  Efficacy of hook-type locking plate and partially threaded cancellous lag screw in the treatment of displaced medial malleolar fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  Byung-Ki Cho; Jun-Beom Kim; Seung-Myung Choi
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 2.928

2.  Comparison of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Fixation for Medial Malleolus Fractures.

Authors:  Andrew P Matson; Stephen R Barchick; Samuel B Adams
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2017-11-01

3.  A novel classification for medial malleolar fracture based on the 3-D reconstruction CT.

Authors:  Fangke Hu; Guoyun Bu; Jun Liang; Haijing Huang; Jinquan He
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Alterations in magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of bioabsorbable magnesium screws over time in humans: a retrospective single center study.

Authors:  Lena Sonnow; Andreas Ziegler; Gesa H Pöhler; Martin H Kirschner; Maximilian Richter; Mustafa Cetin; Melih Unal; Ozkan Kose
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2021-12-23

5.  Comparison between headless compression screws and tension band wires for the fixation of medial malleolar fractures: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Young Hwan Park; Hyun Woo Cho; Jung Woo Choi; Hak Jun Kim
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 2.928

Review 6.  Biomechanics of Osteoporotic Fracture Fixation.

Authors:  Marianne Hollensteiner; Sabrina Sandriesser; Emily Bliven; Christian von Rüden; Peter Augat
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.096

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.