BACKGROUND: Minimally displaced radial head and neck fractures are common and the outcome with conservative treatment is generally excellent. A new protocol was introduced to manage patients with these suspected fractures at a major urban hospital. Simple, undisplaced fractures without other associated injuries or instability were discharged with structured advice but no further face-to-face review. Patients with more complex injuries were reviewed at a "virtual clinic." The aim of this study was to examine the outcome of this process in terms of patient flow, satisfaction, reattendance, and reintervention. METHODS: The 202 eligible patients, who presented during a 1-year period from October 2011 to October 2012, were identified retrospectively from a prospectively collected administrative database. Mason type III and IV fractures were excluded. A questionnaire was administered by mail or phone call to assess satisfaction with the process, information received, and function. RESULTS: Twenty (10%) patients required face-to-face review in a clinic, whereas 182 (90%) were managed with direct discharge; 155 patients responded to the survey (77%). The overall satisfaction rate was 96% in the suspected fracture group and 87% in the definite fracture group (P = .08). Satisfaction with the information provided was 95%. Two (1%) required late surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: In this study, patients with suspected Mason I or II fractures were managed with limited face-to-face follow-up with high satisfaction rates. The reintervention rate was extremely low. This process has significant benefits to patients, who have fewer hospital visits, and to orthopaedic departments, which have more time to devote to complex cases.
BACKGROUND: Minimally displaced radial head and neck fractures are common and the outcome with conservative treatment is generally excellent. A new protocol was introduced to manage patients with these suspected fractures at a major urban hospital. Simple, undisplaced fractures without other associated injuries or instability were discharged with structured advice but no further face-to-face review. Patients with more complex injuries were reviewed at a "virtual clinic." The aim of this study was to examine the outcome of this process in terms of patient flow, satisfaction, reattendance, and reintervention. METHODS: The 202 eligible patients, who presented during a 1-year period from October 2011 to October 2012, were identified retrospectively from a prospectively collected administrative database. Mason type III and IV fractures were excluded. A questionnaire was administered by mail or phone call to assess satisfaction with the process, information received, and function. RESULTS: Twenty (10%) patients required face-to-face review in a clinic, whereas 182 (90%) were managed with direct discharge; 155 patients responded to the survey (77%). The overall satisfaction rate was 96% in the suspected fracture group and 87% in the definite fracture group (P = .08). Satisfaction with the information provided was 95%. Two (1%) required late surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: In this study, patients with suspected Mason I or II fractures were managed with limited face-to-face follow-up with high satisfaction rates. The reintervention rate was extremely low. This process has significant benefits to patients, who have fewer hospital visits, and to orthopaedic departments, which have more time to devote to complex cases.
Authors: Gerard A Sheridan; Matthew Nagle; Catherine Howells; Olga Gallagher; Patrick J Kiely; Patrick O'Toole; Paula M Kelly; David P Moore Journal: Ir J Med Sci Date: 2019-05-25 Impact factor: 1.568
Authors: David Gamble; Paul J Jenkins; Martyn J Edge; Alisdair Gilmour; Iain C Anthony; Margaret Nugent; Lech A Rymaszewski Journal: Hand (N Y) Date: 2015-02-18
Authors: J Vardy; P J Jenkins; K Clark; M Chekroud; K Begbie; I Anthony; L A Rymaszewski; A J Ireland Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2014-06-13 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Katriona Brooksbank; Paul J Jenkins; Iain C Anthony; Alisdair Gilmour; Margaret P Nugent; Lech A Rymaszewski Journal: J Trauma Manag Outcomes Date: 2014-12-10
Authors: Evelyn P Murphy; Christopher Fenelon; Robert P Murphy; Michael D O'Sullivan; Eoghan Pomeroy; Eoin Sheehan; David P Moore Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2020-11 Impact factor: 4.755